Cercle

The bat signal for your closest friends.

Health & Fitness

Messaging

Social Media

Visit WebsiteSee on Product HuntApp Store ⧉Twitter ⧉

the resources-after-continuous-low-mood feature is a good answer to a related problem, but I think it's solving the person's side of this rather than the friend group's side. my question was more about whether the friends themselves start treating a long-running "struggling" status as background noise after week three, not whether the logger gets offered help - those feel like two separate things worth designing for separately. is that friend-fatigue angle something you're tracking too, or mostly focused on the person doing the logging for now?

The mood sharing concept is really thoughtful, especially the home screen widget idea. One thing that might help would be letting users customize how often they get pinged about friends who are struggling, maybe with a quiet hours setting so it doesn't feel overwhelming or guilt-inducing when you're unavailable. Could make a big difference for people prone to burnout from constant emotional labor.

the reciprocal-gate thread above is the real design tension here, but there's a second one on the other side: what happens when someone logs low mood often, not once after ten months of silence, but as their baseline. does the friend group eventually stop reacting the same way to a widget that's been on "struggling" for three weeks straight? the whole point is catching the person who's usually fine and suddenly isn't, but I'd worry the signal gets noisier the more someone actually needs it long-term, not less.

People almost never say they're struggling, they just go quiet. Having your closest circle's state show up on your home screen before the phone call, without anyone having to perform okay-ness, matches exactly what I've seen after years of running group retreats. Loneliness spreads in silence long before anyone names it. Rooting for this one.

Sheeta, the founding story has a detail the rest of the thread hasn't picked up. Your friend went quiet for ten months because she didn't have it in her to have a conversation. That same person also doesn't have it in her to complete a daily check-in.

Which is why the reciprocal gate is the thing I'd pressure-test. You offered it to Irene as the retention answer and it clearly works for the engaged middle. But it's a lock, and the people it locks out are the tail the app was built for. Three weeks into a bad stretch someone opens Cercle, gets asked to log first, and closes it. Her friends see nothing, and she sees nothing either, on the day it matters most.

I build in a different category, in-the-moment support for parents, where the user is depleted by definition, and the rule I keep coming back to is that any gate in front of the thing that helps gets paid by whoever is worst off. Mutuality is a fair principle when everyone is fine.

Two things I'd want to know. Does lighting the bat signal bypass the gate in both directions, so a low mood logged after a long silence still reaches friends who also haven't logged lately? And do you treat prolonged silence as a signal in itself? In your own story the ten months was the message, but a mood log renders silence as no data.

The reciprocal check-in mechanic — you have to log before you can see — is smart because it makes the value exchange explicit and keeps it feeling mutual rather than one-sided. What I'm curious about is the Cercle size itself: is there a cap on how many people can be in one circle, or does it scale to the size of your friend group? That changes whether this works as a tight inner-circle tool or something bigger with looser ties.

Love that the mood lives on a home screen widget, so support becomes proactive instead of waiting for someone to find the words to ask for it.

I really like the idea of focusing on close friends instead of trying to build another social network.

I'm curious: after people complete the first few check-ins, do they tend to keep using it consistently, or is building the habit the biggest challenge?

This is a considered take on a hard problem. A question about the self side rather than the friend side: does a daily mood check-in change how well people come to understand their own patterns over time, or is the log mainly a signal for others?

Sheeta, the screen that stopped me was the third check-in step, because Want to Isolate is the hardest state to build for and you already named it.

The preference lives in the log, but the delivery surface may not honor it. A low mood still lands on a home screen widget, and the person seeing it is the same friend from your story who sent countless texts. I build AI for clinicians and the rule there is identical: a stated preference about being contacted only counts if the system downstream enforces it, otherwise it is a note nobody acts on.

Does the widget hold or soften an update when someone picks Want to Isolate, or does the mood go out either way?