This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet.
It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Product comments vs the next 3
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Product upvotes and comments
Product vs the next 3
FoxyCAD
A conversational workspace for hardware prototypes
Bring engineering conversations, CAD models, schematics and build documents into one workspace. FoxyCAD helps makers explore electronics and enclosures with interactive artifact viewers and an AI assistant.
About FoxyCAD on Product Hunt
“A conversational workspace for hardware prototypes”
FoxyCAD was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #141 on the daily leaderboard. Bring engineering conversations, CAD models, schematics and build documents into one workspace. FoxyCAD helps makers explore electronics and enclosures with interactive artifact viewers and an AI assistant.
On the analytics side, FoxyCAD competes within Hardware — topics that collectively have 11.5k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how FoxyCAD performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted FoxyCAD?
FoxyCAD was hunted by Yury Zubarovsky. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of FoxyCAD including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Hi, I’m Yury, the builder behind FoxyCAD. Hardware ideas generate conversations, models, schematics and decisions. I’m building a workspace that keeps those pieces together for makers and small engineering teams.
The focus is a conversation-to-artifact workflow with inspectable files and engineering guidance. Flux also covers electronics and mechanical work; Fusion spans CAD, CAM, CAE and PCB. FoxyCAD is not presented as a replacement for their depth or for engineering review.
The gallery is the public illustrative workspace example, including a visual concept—not evidence of a manufactured device. Checks depend on the available project tools, and outputs require review and physical validation.
Where do you most often lose context between an engineering conversation and the resulting files?