This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet.
It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).

Product Thumbnail

Testovex

No-code, AI test automation for enterprise QA

SaaS
Developer Tools
No-Code
Visit WebsiteSee on Product Hunt

Hunted byPuneet KambojPuneet Kamboj

Testovex is an Automation Center of Excellence (ACOE) platform that lets enterprise QA teams build, manage, and run end-to-end tests — without writing code.

Top comment

Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm Puneet, founder of Testovex. I built this to fix a problem that's quietly eaten years of QA teams' time: flaky, high-maintenance test automation. Every UI change breaks scripts, Selenium suites rot, and teams spend more time fixing tests than writing them. The "no-code" alternatives that solve this (Tosca, Katalon, etc.) are priced per-seat and per-node, so the cost explodes the moment your team grows. So I spent the last several months building Testovex solo — a no-code test automation platform running on a Playwright engine. You get Playwright's speed and reliability, but a manual QA can build tests by recording a flow in Chrome — no code, no engineers required. What's live in beta today: ✅ No-code builder + Chrome recorder ✅ Playwright execution — cross-browser, parallel ✅ Smart locators (9 strategies) so tests survive UI changes ✅ Reusable components, RBAC, version history ✅ Run recording — video, screenshots, traces ✅ CLI + CI/CD It's free during beta, and I'm doing hands-on onboarding personally. I'd genuinely love your feedback — especially from anyone in QA or test automation. What's the most painful part of keeping your test suites alive? And what would make you trust a no-code tool with your test coverage? Happy to answer anything 🙏

Comment highlights

Another one worth flagging — this one's newer and I think it solves a problem most test automation tools don't even try to touch: testing from the requirement, before the app is even built.

Most tools generate tests by scanning an existing, built app — which means the tests just validate "does this match itself," not "does this match what was actually supposed to be built." Testovex's Blueprint feature flips that: give it a user story or requirement, and it generates test cases straight from the spec — referencing elements semantically (by role/label/name), since the UI doesn't exist yet.

Once the app is built, one click binds those tests to the real UI — matching each semantic reference to actual elements. Then Testovex generates a Conformance Report: a traceability matrix showing exactly where the build matches the spec, and flags anything the requirement expected that never got implemented (or behaves differently than specified).

Basically: instead of "here are some tests for what we built," it's "here's proof of whether we built what we said we would." That gap — between what was specced and what shipped — is usually invisible until a customer finds it. This surfaces it automatically.

Would love thoughts from anyone who's dealt with that spec-vs-built drift on their own teams 👇

👋 Quick update for anyone checking out Testovex today —

One feature I want to make sure people don't miss: AI-powered test generation from a URL.

Paste any page URL — no code, no setup — and Testovex reads the page and generates a full set of executable test cases in under a minute. Not a checklist, not pseudocode — real Playwright tests with steps, locators, and assertions, ready to run.

It covers happy path, negative cases, UX checks, and validation — the same scenarios a sharp QA engineer would think to test manually. Every test lands as a Draft first, so your team reviews and approves before anything runs — AI drafts, humans decide.

If you're evaluating test automation tools, this is the part I'd try first. Happy to answer any questions below 👇

A native integration with Jira or Linear would save us a ton of time, since right now we manually link test runs back to tickets and it gets messy fast. If a failing test could auto-create or comment on the linked issue with logs and screenshots attached, that would close the loop between QA and dev without any extra glue work. Would love to see something like that on the roadmap.

About Testovex on Product Hunt

No-code, AI test automation for enterprise QA

Testovex was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 4 upvotes and 5 comments, placing #91 on the daily leaderboard. Testovex is an Automation Center of Excellence (ACOE) platform that lets enterprise QA teams build, manage, and run end-to-end tests — without writing code.

Testovex was featured in SaaS (43.6k followers), Developer Tools (517.5k followers) and No-Code (5.9k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 136.9k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.

Who hunted Testovex?

Testovex was hunted by Puneet Kamboj. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.

Want to see how Testovex stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.