Stigg 2.0

The usage runtime for AI products

Software Engineering

Developer Tools

Artificial Intelligence

Visit WebsiteSee on Product HuntTwitter ⧉

Makes sense, the atomic hold is the answer I was hoping for. The bit I'd still watch is estimate drift: if you reserve worst-case output tokens per call, a 50-wide agent fan-out holds far more than it spends and can start false-blocking once the wallet is mostly reserved rather than actually spent. And a hold from a call that dies mid-stream leaks until something reaps it. Do you release the estimate-minus-actual delta on settle, and is there a TTL on orphaned holds?

Congrats on the launch. I hand-rolled entitlements for my own two-plan SaaS last week: one feature flag and a couple of can_use_x? methods (super simple). I assume it ends in tears somewhere around plan number four. Curious where you see the crossover in practice. Is it plan count, team size, or the first customer who asks for a custom contract?

Finally cracked our entitlement sprawl with this. Love that credit checks happen in the request path so we're not patching things together after the invoice fires. Setup was painless.

how does this handle usage coming from multiple agents or services hitting the same entitlement at the same millisecond without one of them getting blocked unexpectedly

How does the BYOC setup actually work in practice, does my billing data leave Stigg's infra at all or do you just push metering events into my own system?

Honestly impressed by how quick the credit checks are - the request path enforcement feels like the right call instead of wrestling with reconciliation after the fact.

how does the sub-millisecond credit check actually hold up when an agent is hammering the API in tight loops, does it queue or just drop the extra requests

love how you put governance right in the request path instead of patching it after the fact, such a clean architectural call for AI products

the modular BYOC split is interesting - usage governance running in my own VPC while the credits engine stays centralized. what happens during a network partition between the two, where my enforcement layer can't reach the central ledger for a stretch. does governance keep enforcing against its last known balance, or does that gap turn into the same fail-open risk people are asking about elsewhere in this thread

how does this actually handle the real-time enforcement without slowing down the request path, especially when billing data lives in a separate stack?

How does the BYOC setup actually work in practice, like do I keep my existing Stripe account and Stigg just sits in front of it, or does it want to own the billing pipeline end to end?

Pushed a couple of test requests through and the credit check really does come back instantly, no awkward wait before the request resolves. Clean DX overall, especially for wrapping it around an existing billing setup.

Tried Stigg on a small side project and was surprised how easy it was to wire credit checks right into the request path instead of patching things together later. The sub-millisecond thing actually held up in my testing.

How does the sub-millisecond credit check actually work under the hood when integrating with something like Stripe or a custom billing backend? Curious if there is extra latency added to the request path in practice.

Plugged the SDK in and the entitlement checks actually fire inside the request path, no more end-of-month reconciliation surprises. The credit burn updates feel instant too.

Love that it enforces in the request path instead of reconciling after the fact. The sub-millisecond credit checks actually feel invisible during testing, which is exactly what you want from this kind of layer.

Plugged it into a side project last night and was surprised how fast the entitlement checks land, basically no latency bump. The governance dashboard also made it obvious which test accounts were poking limits.

Putting enforcement in the request path instead of reconciling on the invoice is the right call, month-end reconciliation is how agent loops quietly torch a budget. My one operational worry is the dependency itself: when Stigg is slow or unreachable, does the check fail-open (let the request through and risk overdraft) or fail-closed (block the customer)? For a sub-ms hot-path gate that degradation default is the thing I'd need pinned down before putting it in front of live traffic.