This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
ShardStitch
Every AI tool locks you in. ShardStitch sets you free.
Every AI coding tool has a limit. When Claude, Codex, Gemini, or Cursor hits it, ShardStitch recovers what's still on disk — git diff, uncommitted work, architecture, and last intent — without asking the dead AI for help. Handoff across 23 AI tools, or restart clean in the same one. 100% local, zero telemetry, no cloud. The limits are their problem. Recovering your session is ours. One-time payment, no subscription.
I built ShardStitch because I kept hitting rate limits mid-session and losing everything. Two things kept failing me: 1. Manual copy-paste into a new chat bloats the context and the new AI loses your real architecture — previously working code starts breaking. 2. When the session gets too bloated to even generate a handoff, you're completely stuck. Claude says "Conversation is too long" with +4,000 lines uncommitted and no way forward. ShardStitch solves both: → Reads what survives on disk — git diff, uncommitted work, architecture, dependency graph, last intent → Packages a handoff for Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Aider, or DeepSeek → When switching is impossible, trims the conversation tree and opens a clean workspace in the same tool with only the essential context injected No cloud. No telemetry. No asking the dead AI for help. Everything stays on your machine. The limits are their problem. Recovering your session is ours. Happy to answer anything about how it works.
Why dumping your whole repo into the next AI is the wrong fix
Most handoff tools — and every "pack your repo into one file" tool — work by stuffing as much as possible into the next prompt. That's exactly how you burn your rate limit faster, and how the model's attention starts degrading past ~50% of its context window.
ShardStitch does the opposite. It recovers only what the next AI can't re-derive on its own — your uncommitted diff, the decisions you made, the paths you already tried and rejected — and sizes that to the target tool's context window. Not the whole repo. Just the part that would otherwise be lost.
→ Smaller handoff, lower token burn → The next session starts sharp instead of pre-bloated → Same whether you're switching tools or restarting the same one clean
The rate limit that killed your session shouldn't be the thing you trip over restarting it.
About ShardStitch on Product Hunt
“Every AI tool locks you in. ShardStitch sets you free.”
ShardStitch was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 8 upvotes and 3 comments, placing #86 on the daily leaderboard. Every AI coding tool has a limit. When Claude, Codex, Gemini, or Cursor hits it, ShardStitch recovers what's still on disk — git diff, uncommitted work, architecture, and last intent — without asking the dead AI for help. Handoff across 23 AI tools, or restart clean in the same one. 100% local, zero telemetry, no cloud. The limits are their problem. Recovering your session is ours. One-time payment, no subscription.
ShardStitch was featured in Productivity (656.3k followers), Developer Tools (515.9k followers) and Artificial Intelligence (473.8k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 330.1k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted ShardStitch?
ShardStitch was hunted by Roshan Dixit. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how ShardStitch stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Roshan Dixit
I built ShardStitch because I kept hitting rate limits mid-session and losing everything. Two things kept failing me: 1. Manual copy-paste into a new chat bloats the context and the new AI loses your real architecture — previously working code starts breaking. 2. When the session gets too bloated to even generate a handoff, you're completely stuck. Claude says "Conversation is too long" with +4,000 lines uncommitted and no way forward. ShardStitch solves both: → Reads what survives on disk — git diff, uncommitted work, architecture, dependency graph, last intent → Packages a handoff for Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Aider, or DeepSeek → When switching is impossible, trims the conversation tree and opens a clean workspace in the same tool with only the essential context injected No cloud. No telemetry. No asking the dead AI for help. Everything stays on your machine. The limits are their problem. Recovering your session is ours. Happy to answer anything about how it works.