This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Seodar
195 checks for SEO and accessibility. Free, no account.
Most SEO tools hand you a score and expect you to trust it. Seodar shows the arithmetic: 100 minus weighted penalties, capped per category, with all 195 checks named in public. It crawls after JavaScript runs, so it measures the page a visitor actually gets, and it says what it could not reach instead of quietly scoring it anyway. Accessibility is in the same crawl, not a separate product: axe-core against WCAG 2.2, every finding citing its criterion. Free scan of 25 pages, no account.
I have spent sixteen years building systems that measure things, starting in a Samsung laboratory and spending the last nine in iGaming, where being wrong about a number has a price attached to it.
Seodar came out of a frustration I could not let go of. Every SEO tool I used handed me a score out of 100 and no way to check it. Why 61 and not 74? Which finding moved it? If I fix this one thing, what happens? You cannot answer any of those, so the number is decoration.
So this one shows its working. The score is 100 minus weighted penalties, capped per category, and you can see which check took which points. All 195 checks are listed publicly at seodar.io/checks with what each one costs you. When the crawler cannot reach something, it says so rather than scoring the page as if it had.
Accessibility went into the same crawl because it is the same fetch. Running axe-core against WCAG 2.2 while the page is already open is nearly free, and it turns out the people who need one usually need both.
It is free to try on 25 pages with no account. Paste a URL and you get a score and the findings.
What I would most like feedback on: does the score read as honest to you, or does it still feel like a number you are being asked to trust? That is the whole thesis and I would rather hear it now than in six months.
No comment highlights available yet. Please check back later!
About Seodar on Product Hunt
“195 checks for SEO and accessibility. Free, no account.”
Seodar was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 3 comments, placing #58 on the daily leaderboard. Most SEO tools hand you a score and expect you to trust it. Seodar shows the arithmetic: 100 minus weighted penalties, capped per category, with all 195 checks named in public. It crawls after JavaScript runs, so it measures the page a visitor actually gets, and it says what it could not reach instead of quietly scoring it anyway. Accessibility is in the same crawl, not a separate product: axe-core against WCAG 2.2, every finding citing its criterion. Free scan of 25 pages, no account.
Seodar was featured in SEO (38.1k followers) and Developer Tools (519k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 93.1k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted Seodar?
Seodar was hunted by Petar Nikolic. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how Seodar stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Petar Nikolic
Hi Product Hunt,
I have spent sixteen years building systems that measure things, starting in a Samsung laboratory and spending the last nine in iGaming, where being wrong about a number has a price attached to it.
Seodar came out of a frustration I could not let go of. Every SEO tool I used handed me a score out of 100 and no way to check it. Why 61 and not 74? Which finding moved it? If I fix this one thing, what happens? You cannot answer any of those, so the number is decoration.
So this one shows its working. The score is 100 minus weighted penalties, capped per category, and you can see which check took which points. All 195 checks are listed publicly at seodar.io/checks with what each one costs you. When the crawler cannot reach something, it says so rather than scoring the page as if it had.
Accessibility went into the same crawl because it is the same fetch. Running axe-core against WCAG 2.2 while the page is already open is nearly free, and it turns out the people who need one usually need both.
It is free to try on 25 pages with no account. Paste a URL and you get a score and the findings.
What I would most like feedback on: does the score read as honest to you, or does it still feel like a number you are being asked to trust? That is the whole thesis and I would rather hear it now than in six months.
Petar