This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
I made a small tool to stop remote candidates answering straight from AI in our interviews and cheating. Frustratingly our coding exercises had no defence against AI reading tools providing answers instantly to candidates.
SecureInterview works in-browser and stops all on-device AI tools, preventing screen reading our questions/coding exercises. It's effective against apps like Cluely, Granola, Interview Coder. It uses DRM & tech licensed from another company, for which we provide free. There is Microsoft Purview which wasn't strictly made for this and works similarly but is not fully cross-platform like SI and requires Enterprise licenses (multiple $0,0000 usually).
So far the feedback from the company internally is very positive and works well at stopping AI screen readers I was allowed to test at work internally so already been multiple iterations and funny stories from managers who say the look on some peoples faces when they can't figure out why AI tools isnt working.
Feedback welcome on my little app, and stories about your experiences, ways you use tackle AI use in interviews, if you accept it or exclude its use.
Challenges: This was a surprise to me. The protected video space was difficult to navigate and took months. Lots of NDAs & patents. It seems each platform like Android, Windows and MacOS strictly control who can operate the license processes. Next challenge were Patents. The first POC used WebRTC, arguably a better protocol for video calls. But I went to discover a patent (EZDRM WebRTC) that stopped WebRTC being used in this way. I looked at using other transports only to discover more patented or patent-pending filings, turns out this space is heavily congested with active and new Patent filings from Dolby Red5, EZDRM, castLabs and others because of TV and film. My company didn't want risk any legal issues so it stalled for months. I tried thinking of alternative workarounds but the companies legal team said the Patents are too broad and too risky to navigate. Eventually reaching out a company that had a compatible Patent. I negotiated a generous low fee approach for this specific use case hence why a generous free tier exist.
PS Try taking a screenshot or screen record as a candidate, the interviewers video and screen share should be blocked.
No comment highlights available yet. Please check back later!
About SecureInterview on Product Hunt
“Protect interviews from AI cheating”
SecureInterview was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #107 on the daily leaderboard. Prevent the use of AI screen reading and cheating tools in your interviews.
SecureInterview was featured in Video Streaming (12k followers), Meetings (6.5k followers) and Career (2.3k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 13.1k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted SecureInterview?
SecureInterview was hunted by Jay. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how SecureInterview stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Jay
I made a small tool to stop remote candidates answering straight from AI in our interviews and cheating. Frustratingly our coding exercises had no defence against AI reading tools providing answers instantly to candidates.
SecureInterview works in-browser and stops all on-device AI tools, preventing screen reading our questions/coding exercises. It's effective against apps like Cluely, Granola, Interview Coder. It uses DRM & tech licensed from another company, for which we provide free. There is Microsoft Purview which wasn't strictly made for this and works similarly but is not fully cross-platform like SI and requires Enterprise licenses (multiple $0,0000 usually).
So far the feedback from the company internally is very positive and works well at stopping AI screen readers I was allowed to test at work internally so already been multiple iterations and funny stories from managers who say the look on some peoples faces when they can't figure out why AI tools isnt working.
Feedback welcome on my little app, and stories about your experiences, ways you use tackle AI use in interviews, if you accept it or exclude its use.
Challenges: This was a surprise to me. The protected video space was difficult to navigate and took months. Lots of NDAs & patents. It seems each platform like Android, Windows and MacOS strictly control who can operate the license processes. Next challenge were Patents. The first POC used WebRTC, arguably a better protocol for video calls. But I went to discover a patent (EZDRM WebRTC) that stopped WebRTC being used in this way. I looked at using other transports only to discover more patented or patent-pending filings, turns out this space is heavily congested with active and new Patent filings from Dolby Red5, EZDRM, castLabs and others because of TV and film. My company didn't want risk any legal issues so it stalled for months. I tried thinking of alternative workarounds but the companies legal team said the Patents are too broad and too risky to navigate. Eventually reaching out a company that had a compatible Patent. I negotiated a generous low fee approach for this specific use case hence why a generous free tier exist.
PS Try taking a screenshot or screen record as a candidate, the interviewers video and screen share should be blocked.