This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
revüe — Proof Workflow
On-brand AI work that has to prove it is ready to ship
An open AI review skill that inspects the real artifact, separates proof from assumptions, audits design and marketing output against a brand lock, rejects unapproved claims, and returns ship, ship with changes, caution, or block. MIT-licensed, 108 automated eval cases, local stdlib-only validators, and support for Claude Code, Codex, and Cowork.
I built revüe after seeing the same failure pattern in AI-assisted creative work: the first draft looks finished before it is proven. A polished page can still be off-brand. A persuasive metric can still be invented. A Premium layout can still be a generic template with nicer spacing. revüe turns those failure modes into gates: evidence names its source and freshness; colors, fonts, claims, hard noes, and structure can be locked and audited; Premium work clears an additional craft bar; and a ship verdict is invalid when an audit fails. The repository includes 108 eval cases and adversarial fixtures that try hidden colors, obfuscated banned copy, fabricated metrics, and forged audit results. It is open under MIT. I would especially value feedback on where the gates feel too strict and which real-world failure mode deserves the next regression test.
Great to see revüe — Proof Workflow live on Product Hunt today. Wishing you a strong launch! 🎉
One thing that would help a lot: a side-by-side diff view showing exactly which claims or design elements got flagged and why, so editors can see the reasoning before deciding whether to ship or revise. Right now the verdict is clear but the "why" feels a bit buried.
Love that you separated proof from assumptions in the audit pipeline, that distinction alone keeps marketing claims from quietly sneaking past design intent. The ship/caution/block ladder also feels like the right level of nuance instead of a blunt yes-or-no.
A way to export the eval results as a diff against a brand lock would be huge for us, so we can see exactly what triggered a caution or block across PRs over time. Right now the verdict is great but the reasoning feels a bit buried in the output.
honestly love that you went stdlib-only for the validators, that kind of restraint is rare. the ship/block/cauction taxonomy is basically a tiny decision framework and it makes the whole thing feel like an actual review partner instead of another generic ai checker.
A "why" trace next to each verdict would be huge, even just the specific eval cases that flipped the decision. Right now I can see ship vs block, but when it disagrees with my gut I have to dig through the rules myself to figure out which assumption it flagged.
Love the "ship with changes" middle ground, that feels way more useful than a binary pass fail. One thing that would help me actually trust the output: show the exact regex or check that tripped a block, right next to the verdict. When it says "caution" because a headline sounds too marketing-y, I want to see the signal that made it say that so I can fix it fast without digging.
The stdlib-only validators are a really thoughtful choice, keeps the whole thing auditable without dragging in a dozen transitive deps. And shipping 108 eval cases out the gate shows the team actually stress-tested the thing before asking anyone to trust it.
About revüe — Proof Workflow on Product Hunt
“On-brand AI work that has to prove it is ready to ship”
revüe — Proof Workflow was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 14 upvotes and 9 comments, placing #71 on the daily leaderboard. An open AI review skill that inspects the real artifact, separates proof from assumptions, audits design and marketing output against a brand lock, rejects unapproved claims, and returns ship, ship with changes, caution, or block. MIT-licensed, 108 automated eval cases, local stdlib-only validators, and support for Claude Code, Codex, and Cowork.
revüe — Proof Workflow was featured in Design Tools (261.4k followers), Developer Tools (516.3k followers), Artificial Intelligence (474.3k followers) and GitHub (41.3k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 251.7k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted revüe — Proof Workflow?
revüe — Proof Workflow was hunted by Gary Corriston. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how revüe — Proof Workflow stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Gary Corriston