This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
RecReview
Your video workflow in one place. From REC to review.
The Frame.io alternative built by producers. AI review catches mistakes before your clients do. Plan, shoot, approve — one flat price, unlimited users. 15-day free trial.
Here's a story: The client approved the script on a Tuesday. We shot it on Thursday. Somewhere on set a line changed (because a line always changes), and it was a better line. Everyone in the room agreed.
Three weeks later, round four of review, she wrote: "this isn't what we approved." She was right.
The approved script was in a Doc.
The change happened out loud, on a set, with a camera running.
Those two things had no way of ever meeting.
Hi, I'm Samuel. I've been running a video production company in Brazil for ten years, 8,000+ videos delivered. That's not an unusual story.
Here's what took me a decade to see: a video has two lives.
There's REC, the part with the script, the shoot day, the talent, the hours.
There's Review, the part with the client, the versions, the notes, the approval.
Every tool I ever paid for owned exactly one of them and pretended the other didn't exist.
So... the script lived in Docs. The shoot day lived in a spreadsheet. The video cut went to Frameio. Tasks went to Asana. Delivery went out on WeTransfer. And Zapier held the seams together, right up until I was the only person alive who understood how.
Then Adobe took Frameio upmarket, and my options were enterprise pricing or that same patchwork forever.
So I spent a year building the other thing instead: REC and Review in one place, which is where the name comes from, and which sounds obvious until you see what it actually does :)
The script you approve is the script the talent reads on shoot day. The teleprompter runs off it, on any screen, nobody installs anything.
Three days later the AI reviews the first cut against that same approved script and tells me exactly where the edit drifted. Same document, three moments in its life, zero copy and paste. No standalone review tool can do that.
The hours logged on set come back out the other end. When a version ships, the client gets a plain-language changelog: what changed, which of their notes got addressed, how long it took. Nobody on my team writes it.
Every project carries two deadlines: the one the client sees and mine. Mine stops running while I'm waiting on them. Ten years of absorbing delays that were never my fault went into that one line.
And the render never gets dragged anywhere. The Mac app watches my export folder, the file becomes the next version, the client gets told. I haven't uploaded a video by hand since January!
Flat price, unlimited users. Half the people in any approval or freelance chain show up twice a month and disappear. Charging per seat for that is charging the most for the exact behavior the work depends on.
Every Silvertake project has run through this since January. Same team, 20% more deliveries. I also write the code, so I hit every bug before you get the chance.
What's missing: no iPhone or iPad app yet, and the integrations list is thin. That's the next three months.
So: what's your worst approval story? Mine's up there and I doubt it's the worst in this thread. The bad ones are where the roadmap comes from! :)
No comment highlights available yet. Please check back later!
About RecReview on Product Hunt
“Your video workflow in one place. From REC to review.”
RecReview was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #106 on the daily leaderboard. The Frame.io alternative built by producers. AI review catches mistakes before your clients do. Plan, shoot, approve — one flat price, unlimited users. 15-day free trial.
RecReview was featured in Task Management (84.3k followers), Photo & Video (2k followers) and Video (2k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 19.5k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted RecReview?
RecReview was hunted by Samuel Silva. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how RecReview stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Samuel Silva
Here's a story: The client approved the script on a Tuesday. We shot it on Thursday. Somewhere on set a line changed (because a line always changes), and it was a better line. Everyone in the room agreed.
Three weeks later, round four of review, she wrote: "this isn't what we approved." She was right.
The approved script was in a Doc.
The change happened out loud, on a set, with a camera running.
Those two things had no way of ever meeting.
Hi, I'm Samuel. I've been running a video production company in Brazil for ten years, 8,000+ videos delivered. That's not an unusual story.
Here's what took me a decade to see: a video has two lives.
There's REC, the part with the script, the shoot day, the talent, the hours.
There's Review, the part with the client, the versions, the notes, the approval.
Every tool I ever paid for owned exactly one of them and pretended the other didn't exist.
So... the script lived in Docs. The shoot day lived in a spreadsheet. The video cut went to Frameio. Tasks went to Asana. Delivery went out on WeTransfer. And Zapier held the seams together, right up until I was the only person alive who understood how.
Then Adobe took Frameio upmarket, and my options were enterprise pricing or that same patchwork forever.
So I spent a year building the other thing instead: REC and Review in one place, which is where the name comes from, and which sounds obvious until you see what it actually does :)
The script you approve is the script the talent reads on shoot day. The teleprompter runs off it, on any screen, nobody installs anything.
Three days later the AI reviews the first cut against that same approved script and tells me exactly where the edit drifted. Same document, three moments in its life, zero copy and paste. No standalone review tool can do that.
The hours logged on set come back out the other end. When a version ships, the client gets a plain-language changelog: what changed, which of their notes got addressed, how long it took. Nobody on my team writes it.
Every project carries two deadlines: the one the client sees and mine. Mine stops running while I'm waiting on them. Ten years of absorbing delays that were never my fault went into that one line.
And the render never gets dragged anywhere. The Mac app watches my export folder, the file becomes the next version, the client gets told. I haven't uploaded a video by hand since January!
Flat price, unlimited users. Half the people in any approval or freelance chain show up twice a month and disappear. Charging per seat for that is charging the most for the exact behavior the work depends on.
Every Silvertake project has run through this since January. Same team, 20% more deliveries. I also write the code, so I hit every bug before you get the chance.
What's missing: no iPhone or iPad app yet, and the integrations list is thin. That's the next three months.
So: what's your worst approval story? Mine's up there and I doubt it's the worst in this thread. The bad ones are where the roadmap comes from! :)