Get a fleet of QA agents that protect your product’s quality. Let AI explore your app for full test coverage, monitor staging to catch issues, and deliver debugging context as soon as you open your PRs. Build at full speed and never break prod again.
I’ve spent two decades in engineering leadership, and one thing always stood out: every part of building software has become easier, faster, and more modern.
Except QA. Testing has been standing still.
And while the whole world has accepted “move fast and break things” as the status quo, I want to move fast and not break things.
That’s why we built QA.tech. We want developers to move fast, get feedback quickly, and ship with confidence, without QA being a bottleneck.
AI-assisted development tools are accelerating the pace of shipping for developer teams. On top of that, new builders emerge in this era of vibe coding. They will create numerous applications, all of which will require rigorous testing. I believe that product quality will be the key differentiator in a competitive market.
I believe the best builders are hands-on in every part of the product. That’s also why Product Hunt feels like the right place to launch. We want feedback directly from people who live and breathe building.
To make sure you get to play with QA.tech enough, we’re giving 2x test credits on the week of PH launch.
Excited to hear what you think!
Check the link below for full overview of the 1.0 changes and the backstory of WHY and HOW we built QA.tech
You are right on point. Automated software testing is the need of the hour.
I myself transitioned recently from a non-tech field into web development. With tools like Cursor, you definitely need products like QAtech on the other end, not just to ship fast, but to create better and smoother products.
Definitely gonna give it a try for my upcoming product!
Full coverage, staging alerts, and instant context in your PRs. Build fast, ship safe, never break prod.
Congrats on #1 Product of the Day! 🎉
As someone who's spent years building Selenium automation frameworks, I deeply feel
the pain Daniel mentioned about testing standing still. The selector brittleness
alone has cost me countless hours.
Your goal-driven agent approach is exactly what's been missing, tests that adapt
to changes instead of breaking. Just tested QA.tech with a demo app and I'm
genuinely impressed by how it handles UI changes.
Question: How does the AI prioritize which user journeys to test first for apps
with hundreds of possible flows?
Excited to see where you take this! 🚀
Love this approach: a swarm of QA agents that explore the product like real users, not brittle scripts.
The big win is how they surface “felt” issues—flows, selectors, auth hiccups, jitter—and then turn that into clear, builder-ready reports with repro steps, context, and impact, bridging the gap between user pain and issue resolution.
If QA.tech's agents adapt as UI/UX evolves, this will greatly improve continuous regression coverage!
This looks incredibly powerful! How does QA.tech handle testing dynamic content and components that change frequently, like real-time data displays or frequently updated dashboards? Does the AI need retraining or does it adapt automatically?
This is a super clear value prop. QA has always been the part that lagged behind engineering speed, so the ‘fleet of agents’ idea lands well. Curious — how are you approaching pricing for smaller teams that want strong coverage but can’t commit to enterprise budgets yet?
Wow, major props to the team for shipping this. It’s one thing to promise AI-driven QA. It’s another to deliver a product people might actually rely on...
That said, I’m curious (and a little skeptical): how confident can teams be that the autogenerated tests will catch the weird edge cases, or adapt when UI or flows change mid-sprint? If the AI gets brittle do we end up more debugging the tests than our actual product ??
Anyway, this is the kind of push QA needs... Congratulations again..
Well done guys! This tool looks very promising, especially when we know how time consuming and complex are the tests cases scenarios of our products. I will definitely give it a try. Are you also planning to make it available for mobile Apps at some point?
I am Solutions Engineer for QAtech usually focused on our biggest customers, but let's make something special for PH community - just share an URL to your web app/service and I will create you a PERSONAL testing suite, or if you want I can give you (and/or your team) a personal training on our AI agents.
I invite you to not be humble and share your URL even if you're a small startup and just need something simple right now such as:
an AI that regularly checks if all your forms can be submitted and work properly, if all the links work
an AI that walks through your user stories on your website to find what broke after the last update
an AI that check that your website works well on mobiles too
Congrats on the launch! Finally, QA catching up with modern dev practices.
This is awesome, now all the vibe coders can vibe break their stuff before going to vibe prod!
Jokes apart, really needed tool! Will test it on our own product soon!
Gave this a whirl and first impression is sweet, very smooth onboarding and chat guided test setup.
As a solo builder this sort of tool could be a game changer for testing 🙌
I used @QA.tech to evaluate our new website which is still in a POC phase. I did not know what to expect but it gave many usable insights. A couple of reprompts made the results even better!
Upvoted. Wishing you the best for your launch!
Wow! Congrats to the entire team! It's impressive to see these results (320h saved, 390hours saved, customer after customer), lots of vaporware solutions out there in this space but reading through all these customer cases and testimonials you can see that a lot of thought and work went into this.
ps: Is there something in the water in Stockholm? what is going on?? :))
We are currently rolling out QA.tech in our midsized organization (500 people about 50 engineers). Currently there is a lot of buzz in the office around this tool for a couple different reasons. It makes our product people able to work even closer with the devs making sure we cover more of the user journey. We can catch more edge cases making sure a change in one market don't have an unforceen impact on another. We as devs can spend our time on building and less on QA.
Also QA.tech is just very helpfull and engaged people to work with
Totally see how this could make life easier for smaller teams. Love the idea!
I’ve spent two decades in engineering leadership, and one thing always stood out: every part of building software has become easier, faster, and more modern.
Except QA. Testing has been standing still.
And while the whole world has accepted “move fast and break things” as the status quo, I want to move fast and not break things.
That’s why we built QA.tech. We want developers to move fast, get feedback quickly, and ship with confidence, without QA being a bottleneck.
AI-assisted development tools are accelerating the pace of shipping for developer teams. On top of that, new builders emerge in this era of vibe coding. They will create numerous applications, all of which will require rigorous testing. I believe that product quality will be the key differentiator in a competitive market.
I believe the best builders are hands-on in every part of the product. That’s also why Product Hunt feels like the right place to launch. We want feedback directly from people who live and breathe building.
To make sure you get to play with QA.tech enough, we’re giving 2x test credits on the week of PH launch.
Excited to hear what you think!
Check the link below for full overview of the 1.0 changes and the backstory of WHY and HOW we built QA.tech
https://www.qa.tech/blog/qa-tech-1-0--a-new-way-of-ai-testing-for-developers