This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
System driven Patchflow turns GitHub bugs into reviewable pull requests. Paste a repo and describe the issue; it attempts a small, safe fix, verifies the change, and opens a PR you can inspect before merging. No auto-merge, no subscription—just $1 per repair attempt. Built for small bugs, annoying backlog items, and fixes that are too minor to spend hours on.automated bug repair.
I built Patchflow because I kept running into the same problem: small bugs, test failures, and simple code issues often take longer to deal with than they should. Existing coding agents are powerful, but many of them are subscription-based, usage-limited, or designed for broader coding sessions.
Patchflow is intentionally narrower.
The idea is simple:
One bug → one repair attempt → one reviewable pull request.
You paste a GitHub repo and describe the issue. Patchflow clones the repo in an isolated runner, attempts a small fix, runs available checks where possible, and opens a pull request for you to review.
A few principles shaped the product:
• No auto-merge. You stay in control. • Small diffs over large AI refactors. • Pay per repair attempt, not another monthly subscription. • If Patchflow cannot produce a PR, you are not charged. • Your code is never used for model training.
For launch, I’m starting with a simple early-access price: $1 per fix.
Because this is still an early product and I’m running the repair system with limited capacity, the queue is intentionally capped. If slots are full, you can join the waitlist and I’ll add credits for people who help test the product.
I’d love feedback from developers, students, indie hackers, and small teams.
Would you trust this workflow for small bugs? What would make the PR review experience better?
No comment highlights available yet. Please check back later!
About Patchflow on Product Hunt
“Paste a bug. Get a pull request.”
Patchflow was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 5 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #67 on the daily leaderboard. System driven Patchflow turns GitHub bugs into reviewable pull requests. Paste a repo and describe the issue; it attempts a small, safe fix, verifies the change, and opens a PR you can inspect before merging. No auto-merge, no subscription—just $1 per repair attempt. Built for small bugs, annoying backlog items, and fixes that are too minor to spend hours on.automated bug repair.
Patchflow was featured in SaaS (43k followers), Developer Tools (515.4k followers) and GitHub (41.3k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 148.3k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted Patchflow?
Patchflow was hunted by Sean Chong. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how Patchflow stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Sean Chong
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I’m Sean, the solo maker behind Patchflow.
I built Patchflow because I kept running into the same problem: small bugs, test failures, and simple code issues often take longer to deal with than they should. Existing coding agents are powerful, but many of them are subscription-based, usage-limited, or designed for broader coding sessions.
Patchflow is intentionally narrower.
The idea is simple:
One bug → one repair attempt → one reviewable pull request.
You paste a GitHub repo and describe the issue. Patchflow clones the repo in an isolated runner, attempts a small fix, runs available checks where possible, and opens a pull request for you to review.
A few principles shaped the product:
• No auto-merge. You stay in control.
• Small diffs over large AI refactors.
• Pay per repair attempt, not another monthly subscription.
• If Patchflow cannot produce a PR, you are not charged.
• Your code is never used for model training.
For launch, I’m starting with a simple early-access price: $1 per fix.
Because this is still an early product and I’m running the repair system with limited capacity, the queue is intentionally capped. If slots are full, you can join the waitlist and I’ll add credits for people who help test the product.
I’d love feedback from developers, students, indie hackers, and small teams.
Would you trust this workflow for small bugs? What would make the PR review experience better?