An orchestrator splits your work across Claude Code and Codex agents, each in its own git worktree. A reviewer checks the result, a built-in browser lets agents test their own work, and every question lands in one place. Uses the plans you already have. Free for 14 days.
I often have 10+ AI agents running at once: writing code, reviewing changes, running tests and coordinating the work. Across several projects that can triple, and keeping track of who's doing what gets overwhelming.
So I built ManyAgents, a Mac app where each project gets an orchestrator. It hands work to agents in their own git worktrees, has a reviewer check it, and lets them test their changes in a built-in browser beside the chat. Every question lands in one place.
It's free for 14 days. I'm still working out pricing, so I'd love to hear what you'd pay, and what's missing from how you run your agents today.
The read-only reviewer on a different provider is the detail that stands out to me. With agents in separate git worktrees, a second set of eyes before anything merges feels like the safety net that makes running 10 at once realistic. Do you find the reviewer catches mostly style and consistency issues, or does it also catch real logic problems the worker agent missed?
one place for every agent's question is a nice touch when you're juggling 10+ of them. does each question show which project it came from?
How does the reviewer agent decide a worktree is ready to merge, and what happens when two agents touch the same file? Merge conflicts across parallel branches seem like the hard part.
Wow Stu! Never managed too many agents and feel it's worth it. Is there any kind of trial or free tier?
How does the orchestrator merge the worktrees that touch the same lockfile or migrations before the user sees the result ? does conflicrts get serialized or flagged for manual reviews ?
A read-only reviewer on a different provider is the part I like most. Having a second agent check the work before I see it is what made me trust the agents across my projects.
Putting questions from all the workers in one place makes sense. I'd want the project and proposed decision beside each one so I can answer without reopening every thread.
About ManyAgents on Product Hunt
“Run a team of AI coding agents from one Mac window”
ManyAgents launched on Product Hunt on October 26th, 2026 and earned 99 upvotes and 13 comments, placing #13 on the daily leaderboard. An orchestrator splits your work across Claude Code and Codex agents, each in its own git worktree. A reviewer checks the result, a built-in browser lets agents test their own work, and every question lands in one place. Uses the plans you already have. Free for 14 days.
ManyAgents was featured in Productivity (664k followers), Developer Tools (521.9k followers) and Artificial Intelligence (482.1k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 394.6k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted ManyAgents?
ManyAgents was hunted by Stu Green. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how ManyAgents stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Stu Green
I often have 10+ AI agents running at once: writing code, reviewing changes, running tests and coordinating the work. Across several projects that can triple, and keeping track of who's doing what gets overwhelming.
So I built ManyAgents, a Mac app where each project gets an orchestrator. It hands work to agents in their own git worktrees, has a reviewer check it, and lets them test their changes in a built-in browser beside the chat. Every question lands in one place.
It's free for 14 days. I'm still working out pricing, so I'd love to hear what you'd pay, and what's missing from how you run your agents today.