Product Thumbnail

humans fix ai

Real developers help vibecoders with AI-built apps

Software Engineering
Vibe coding

Hunted byStanislav PrigodichStanislav Prigodich

AI tools like Lovable, Replit, and Cursor make it easy to build apps — but when something breaks, you're often stuck. HumansFix.ai connects non-technical builders with real developers who help with AI-built apps — whether it's bugs, improvements, reviews, or technical questions. Describe your problem in plain words and a developer takes care of it. Affordable — fixed pricing and you set the price. Fast — results within 3 days. Perfect for vibecoders and AI builders with no technical background.

Top comment

Hi Product Hunt 👋

I’m Stan, the maker of humansfix.ai.

Over the past year AI tools like Lovable, Replit, Cursor and v0 made it possible for non-technical people to build real apps. That’s amazing to see.

But there’s a moment many builders hit - something breaks and they don’t know how to fix it. Payments fail, deployments crash, integrations stop working, or the AI-generated code becomes hard to understand.

I built humansfix.ai to help in that moment.

The idea is simple: connect non-technical builders with real developers who can help with AI-built apps. Instead of hiring someone or paying hourly, you can post a task, set the price, and a developer picks it up. Results are delivered within a few days and you only pay after approving the result.

I’m curious what you think.

Thanks for checking it out 🙏

Comment highlights

Great idea and congrats on the launch! Does this only work with vibecoded products? Or any site? What about fixes integrating blockchain?

This feels like an inevitable product with the rise of tools like Lovable, Replit, and Cursor.

AI can get you 80% of the way to an app, but that last 20% (debugging, architecture fixes, edge cases) is where people get stuck. A marketplace for human fixes for AI-built apps is a clever idea. Curious how you’re ensuring quality control for developers on the platform?

This kind of tool is like a ray of light for vibe coders like me. I really want to introduce it in the next project. I support and look forward to it.

Curious how you handle the matching — does the developer self-select based on price, or is there some kind of routing on your end? The gap between "AI built it" and "I can actually maintain it" is very real, and I've seen a lot of teams hit a wall three weeks after shipping something on Lovable. Fixed pricing is smart here because the ambiguity of hourly rates would kill trust with non-technical users. The real challenge is probably scope creep — someone describes a "small bug" and it turns out the whole data model is broken.

Love the concept, I think it answers a very relevant nieche. supported and spread in our internal channels. :)

Stellar idea guys) It is like the next 'StackOverFlow-Generation') but cooler)

Do developers also help with code review and optimization,

or just bug fixes? And what's the average price range for typical tasks

like fixing a broken API integration or adding authentication?

This is very much needed. I know quite a few people people who built something cool with Lovable and then got completely stuck when payments broke or deployment just died on them. The "set your own price" model is interesting too. How do you make sure the devs are actually good though? Any review system or do you vet them before they join?

How does HumansFix.ai manage the handoff of AI-generated codebases between non-technical users and developers to ensure that custom fixes don't break the original "vibecoding" workflow or compatibility with tools like Lovable and Cursor?

This hits a real pain point. I've seen so many people build cool stuff with Cursor and Lovable but then have no idea what to do when something breaks. Having a marketplace to connect them with actual devs is smart.

One thing that could pair really well with this is giving those non-technical builders a way to actually capture what's broken. Something like Blocfeed lets users click on the exact element that's not working and it grabs all the technical context (console errors, CSS selectors, browser info). Would make it way easier for the developers on your platform to understand and fix the issue faster.

How are you handling the matching between builders and devs? Is it based on tech stack, or more like a general queue where anyone can pick up a task?