Product Thumbnail

Fynix

AI-powered development, from idea to execution

Productivity
Developer Tools
Artificial Intelligence

Fynix is an AI-powered coding assistant that adapts to your style by learning your preferences. Boost productivity, streamline workflows, and code effortlessly with natural language commands and customizable AI—all inside your favourite IDE.

Top comment

Hey Product Hunt! 👋 I am thrilled to introduce Fynix, an AI-powered coding assistant we've poured our hearts and expertise into. We believe coding tools should adapt to you, not the other way around. Fynix was built to solve a problem we experienced firsthand. Existing tools felt rigid—they couldn't learn and grow with us. We wanted an assistant that understands your preferences, adapts to your style, and makes coding more seamless and efficient. After months of development, iteration, and feedback, Fynix is here to do just that. Here’s what makes Fynix special: 🎯 Custom AI Rules: Set your own coding standards and let Fynix adapt—whether it’s functional React or another preference. ⚡ Natural Language Commands: Interact with Fynix effortlessly using commands in plain English. 🛠️ Git Integration: Streamline your reviews with Git-powered AI insights and suggestions. We’re on a mission to make coding faster, smarter, and more enjoyable for everyone. Fynix fits right into your favourite IDE and helps you every step of the way—whether it's completing code, generating documentation, or reviewing diffs. We’d love for you to try it out and share your thoughts. Your feedback is crucial to us, and it’s what will help us make Fynix even better. Join our community, and let’s build the future of coding together! 🚀 Check it out, and let us know what you think!

Comment highlights

From a non-tech Tech founder: Will Fynix be able to review existing code and suggest improvements? Do we need to enter prompts asking for specific feedback or does it do an overall scan, review and suggest? Asking to see if this doubles up as a testing tool and for performance review of the team.

Tried for the coding assistant, works well. A must have tool for the product folks interested in coding.

I liked Fynix overall. Its output is good and can be extended easily. Its natural language terminal is life saver.

It feels like having a coding buddy that actually understands your style—AI-powered, seamless, and insanely efficient!

Awesome product, very fast and reliable @ushank_radadiya

Review of Fynix.ai

Fynix.ai seems like a promising tool, but let’s not get too hyped just yet. 🧐 The interface is sleek, and the AI features are decent, but it feels like it’s still in its "awkward teenage phase" — trying to figure out what it wants to be. Compared to giants like Fotor (which nails design simplicity) or Feishu (a powerhouse for productivity), Fynix.ai lacks that "wow" factor. It’s like the middle child of AI tools — not bad, but not stealing the spotlight either. 😅

The customization options are cool, but the execution feels clunky at times. Also, the speed? Meh. 🐢 It’s not as snappy as Manus, which, despite being slow, at least has a clear use case. Fynix.ai needs to step up its game in performance and user experience.

Overall, it’s a solid 6.5/10. It’s got potential, but it’s not quite ready to dethrone the big players. Keep iterating, Fynix.ai! 🚀

P.S. If you’re into AI tools, check out *DeepSeek** for some serious inspo — now that’s a game-changer!*

Where GhatGPT and GitHub Copilot fall short, Fynix takes over. Amazing!!!!!!!!!!

Sounds like a game-changer for the developers. It will surely help them in the development process. Congratulations team!

Been waiting for this launch for a while now. have seen the product grow from when it was called FEX. Congrats on the launch.

@sidharth_nair1 Congratulations on your product launch. Happy to see your progress. Keep rising.

[Professional tone]

Congratulations on launching Fynix - entering the competitive AI coding assistant market with a focus on personalization is a strategic move.

Question: How does Fynix's learning algorithm differentiate between a developer's intentional coding patterns versus potential bad practices that shouldn't be reinforced?