Product Thumbnail

Fire Your QA Today

Automate QA testing with AI

Chrome Extensions
Developer Tools
Artificial Intelligence

Turn your screen recording into a fully autonomous QA agent. Automate testing for your web apps, internal tools, CRMs, and ERPs without scripts or APIs.

Top comment

Hey everyone, Samarth here 👋

Every tech team we spoke to had the same problem: testing breaks momentum and people hate doing it, it’s slow, and API-based automation barely works beyond demo apps .

We realized the only way to fix it was to skip the APIs altogether, so we built a browser-native agent that literally mimics how your actual QA tests your systems. It learns your QA testing flow from a simple screen recording.

All you have to do install this chrome extension and record your screen doing the QA testing like you normally would for atleast one test case and we'll deliver an agent that can run thousands of test cases for you.

To learn more about the process, watch our demo here

It now handles UI tweaks, load times, shadow DOMs, and even some legacy systems that traditional frameworks give up on like Netsuite, SAP, and other ERPs.

Would love to hear more QA Agent use cases from the community and build for them.

Comment highlights

Test cases are still written by a human, right? So it’s more of an assistive tool for QA, did I get that right?

This is super impressive! How well does it handle complex workflows across multiple apps or nested interactions? Would be great to see it in action on tricky legacy systems!

This tool sounds promising for automating repetitive QA tasks, but I'd want to test how reliably it handles edge cases before fully trusting it with critical workflows.

Good thought process .

  1. Does the tool learn as we put in suggestions on scenario coverage.

  2. Apart from straight away page validations and standard UI testing does it automate complex logic testing as well handled from UI ? If a change is done at functionality logic level how does the script self heal or adopt to the new logic without manual intervention

  3. Can we say that your qa ai agent is 100% automated without any need of QA .

  4. Does your qa ai agent run test and maintain results in any test management tool and publish the result in certain platform along with configuration and running tests in cicd pipeline

@shardul_lavekar @maunilparikh @samarth_r_s

You say it handles legacy systems like SAP. How? Those are notoriously hostile to automation because of dynamic IDs and weird iframe structures. What's different about your approach?

No doubt people doing good stuff with AI agent but the way marketing is done here is heartless , demeaning.

+1 @lizzieyuan

Loved it Samarth! I can see here more than a simple QA automated tester but only focusing on this it's quite impressive. I need it right now cause I hate writing code only for testing and this can change that reality for me. All the best!

Big congrats @shardul-lavekar on shipping Fire Your QA Today! 🚀 The team's mission to eliminate repetitive QA script maintenance really resonates, especially with your screen recording-to-autonomous-agent approach. The "QA agent that doesn't sleep" concept perfectly captures how it runs continuous tests across releases. Looking forward to seeing your impact on developer productivity. All the best for launch day!

Cant just believe you automated the painful process of QA! How is the accuracy by using this tool compared to human?

Congrats on the launch! The idea of turning screen recordings into automated tests is brilliant.

How does the AI handle dynamic content or elements that change positions frequently on the page?

"Fire Your QA Today" — this name sounds like a heartless capitalist's rallying cry on layoff day. Making someone's unemployment your selling point? Who's your marketing mentor? Scrooge?

Good tools should empower teams, not celebrate firing them. This naming will only attract the type of managers who see costs, not people.

Congrats on the launch—this feels like you nailed a real pain point.
In web app development, small UI changes can stall momentum. Teaching the agent from a screen recording and running tests directly in the browser maps well to how QA actually works.

I’d like to try this on CRM/internal admin regression tests. A few clarifications:

  1. Stability and tolerance with high‑variance UI. Shadow DOM, delayed rendering.

  2. How failure causes are surfaced in reports. Can they map to our issue tracker?

  3. Data safety in private environments. How are recording and playback boundaries defined?

I’ve installed the extension and will record a typical flow first. If you have enterprise case studies, I’d love to learn more.

Hey everyone, Maunil here 👋

We started by building AI browser agents that could actually operate inside real web apps instead of just calling APIs. We were trying a bunch of use cases, and QA testing turned out to be the one where it just clicked

We first piloted it with a YC startup. the agent learned their QA testing flow directly from a screen recording and started testing their SaaS app on autopilot once we shipped. Results were way better than expected

So after that, we moved into enterprise workflows mostly NetSuite UAT, ERP, and CRM testing where api-based automation breaks half the time. Since our agent runs fully in the browser, it doesn’t care about APIs or integrations

We’ve got it to a point where it can handle UI tweaks, Shadow DOMs, and outdates internal systems - basically all the stuff that breaks normal browser frameworks

If you want a QA agent for your Web app, ERP, CRM, or internal systems, just record your QA flow using this chrome extension → https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/100xbot/dhcenlmiiomefodpnckhfkmidbpfpgnm

Once you submit it, our creator reviews it and we ship you a working agent that tests your app and gives you a clean report on what passed and what failed

If you got any custom enterprise QA workflows to automate, book a demo with us → https://calendly.com/100xbot/shardul/

Excited to hear what kind of systems you’d want to run this on next