Fedica 2.0

Publish and grow your profile across social apps

Social Media

Analytics

Marketing

Visit WebsiteSee on Product HuntTwitter ⧉

I like the profile-growth angle. Curious if the analytics connect content performance back to audience quality, not just impressions and follower count.

matching "same person" across X, Threads, and IG without a shared id seems like the hard part here - is that fuzzy matching on handle/bio/avatar, or does the fan have to link accounts themselves at some point?

the superfan-across-platforms framing is the strongest part of this for me, but it made me think of the opposite failure case - synthetic/bot accounts are getting good enough now to fake a consistent engagement pattern across X, Threads and Instagram at once, not just spam one platform. does the audience intelligence layer have any way to flag "this looks like a coordinated account cluster, not one real superfan," or is that kind of cross-platform bot detection out of scope for what the resolution algorithm is trying to do?

Congrats on the launch, almost took us over too aha)

So im curious could i use this as just a social media scheduling tool too? And by community building you mean like an audience or?

Congrats Samir and team! I noticed you mentioned LinkedIn’s API only exposes stats, unlike X or Bluesky. We’re a B2B company and LinkedIn is where most of our audience lives, so I want to set my expectations right: what does Fedica meaningfully do for a LinkedIn-heavy brand today? Per-platform tailoring and scheduling clearly, but does the unified inbox cover LinkedIn comments and DMs, or does the platform’s API keep that door shut too? Honest answer appreciated, it decides which of our accounts we connect first.

Love the idea of having everything in one place. Quick question, does this get flagged through the social media apps? I've seen this happen to various other tools.

The “Top Interactors” angle feels more useful than another reach dashboard. Knowing who actually keeps showing up is a better starting point for relationships than a bigger impressions number. How are you separating genuine interest from people who simply comment on everything?

Have to be honest I tend not to want to pay for social media addons so generally only sign up for the free plans. I used to use Buffer but have now used Fedica for several years. I can't remember now the reason for switching but whatever it was I'm now happy using Fedica and on the few occassions that I've had problems the team has been very responsive and helpful. Would thoroughly recommend for what I use it for, basic posting to multiple sites (LinkedIn, BlueSky, Mastodon) using the calendar feature. I'm afraid I can't comment on the use fo the more sophisticated features.

Fedica is an amazing tool and product. It doesn't matter if you're a pro or a newbie, Fedica is easy to use and easy to learn. I personally use Fedica for my X account. The information is always up to date and very accurate. Fedica does a great job of tracking your account in real time. I highly recommend anyone trying to build an online presence to use this powerful program. You will see results.

Fedica is fantastic and it's one of the handful of products I evangelize on my own time. The volume of publishing that you can schedule across so many networks is just an eye-popping value that still flies under the radar, in my opinion. I've been a digital marketing guy for over 25 years and one thing I think most people my age would NOT tell you because they don't want to admit it is that, it's intimidating as hell to start a new digital enterprise now than it used to be; the tools are way better now to do so, but the number of places you're supposed to be and establish a presence are dizzying, and I think it's a hard block for a lot of people who may have a good idea but are pre-overwhelmed already, just in the thinking stage, about all the places you need to be publishing in order to get off the ground. That's the specific situation in which Fedica comes up in my discussions; it really does take a lot of that load off once you've set up all your networks. And yes, this would theoretically be true of any aggregator, but with Fedica there's just a few basic things that keep me happy, and I mean super basic: a) Everything usually works the way Fedica says it works. Which puts it in rare air these days. b) When something doesn't work, support is all over it with a good, clear response -- always. c) They just kinda keep their head down and build and add new features without beating me to death with daily emails about how I should be doing this or that. I appreciate that. Compare this to Facebook, which whom I've spent over $5 million over the last 18 years. They've current restricted my personal Facebook account -- which was how you accessed your client's ad accounts in the old days -- because one client, whose account was cancelled in 2016, owes $12.43. I'm therefore not allowed to advertise -- for myself or any of my clients -- and I can't reach Facebook about it; I'm caught in email-redirect hell, and I can't apply for review I'm a scarlet-letter account. My point is: Samir should be running Facebook. :) No but seriously, my point is -- the service is incredible, which is rare, and that beyond the functionality and competitive price is why I'm a lifer.

Congratulations on the launch, @albattran ! 🎉 Fifteen years of audience intelligence behind a 2.0 is a rare kind of foundation.

A question from someone who spends her days with creators. When you surface a superfan who follows someone on three platforms, do you also show where that person actually engages most deeply? I'm thinking of creators deciding where to put a big announcement. Knowing who cares is one gift; knowing where they're actually listening feels like the second one.

Rooting for you today from another team launching alongside you!

What is the biggest engineering challenge in merging 15 years of data with publishing a new pipeline?

I am just wondering is it designed only for creators or businesses, or both? And, How do you keep up with the constant algorithm changes across 12+ social platforms?

the people-level analytics framing is more useful than follower counts for anyone trying to build a real audience rather than just a big one. knowing what your actual engagers care about and where they're from changes how you write content, not just when you post it. curious how the cross-network identity matching works though, if the same person follows you on twitter and linkedin does fedica recognize them as one person or treat them as separate audience members?

Hi. Tailoring content per platform and knowing the people behind your engagements sound complementary, but they can actually pull in opposite directions. If a superfan follows you on three platforms and you're publishing tailored, different content on each, the unified view you have of them internally doesn't match what they're seeing externally, since they only ever get the version tuned for whichever platform they're on. Curious whether Fedica's audience intelligence accounts for the fact that segmenting followers by platform means the same real person can show up as three different profiles unless there's identity resolution tying them together across networks. Also on tracing superfans down to the city, that's a fairly granular location claim for social platforms that mostly don't expose precise location data directly. Is that inferred from posting patterns, timezone activity, and bio text, or is there something more direct feeding that, since the accuracy story matters a lot if someone's using it to actually plan real-world engagement like local meetups or regional campaigns.

A lot of creators assume the same content works everywhere when it really doesn't. Have you noticed any patterns in what consistently needs to be adapted across platforms?

'people back in your analytics' not follower counts is the right fight. when one fan follows me on x and bluesky, do you resolve them as one person or two?

Noticed a reviewer mention they run Fedica alongside other tools just to compare directly, that kind of side by side evaluation is usually what ends up documented in G2/Capterra reviews, since it's hard for a prospect to get that comparison anywhere else. With 32 reviews already, have you found review platforms actually drive real trial signups, or is it more of a trust signal once someone's already evaluating you?