The gap between 1.5x and 100x isn't speed, it's trust!! AI agents generate code 100x faster than humans write it. But your team can't review it all. EasySpecs documents undocumented codebases and turns them into trustworthy specifications, so spec review becomes your new merge request review. Ground your agents in reality. Scale agentic development without babysitting. Document the foundation once. Review specs including Oracles and Rubrics and Ship code you actually verified.
I'm Xesca, CTO turned founder. Before EasySpecs, I spent 15+ years being the person accountable for code I didn't personally write, across fintech, insurtech, and media.
That's the job now for every engineering leader: your agents ship code faster than anyone can read it, and you're still the one who answers for what breaks.
The problem
I kept hitting the same wall everywhere I looked:
Teams adopt AI coding agents, and PRs pile up faster than anyone can review them
Specs get written against a mental model of the codebase, not the actual codebase
Agents generate code against those specs
Things break silently, and nobody can trace why, because nobody documented what was actually there to begin with
Code review is dead. Spec review is where quality lives now. But spec review only works if the spec is grounded in reality, not guesswork.
What EasySpecs does
Two things, one workflow:
1. We document your codebase automatically
Even the undocumented, nobody-wants-to-touch-it kind. Our first real test was a pharmaceutical company's legacy Delphi system. If it works there, it works on whatever you're building.
2. We turn that understanding into specs your team and your agents can actually trust
Every spec comes paired with validators, so you know it matches the app before anyone codes against it.
Here's the part I'm most proud of: as you write a spec, the specs crafter suggests oracles and rubrics for it, concrete, checkable ways to verify the change actually did what the spec said.
Oracles — the "does this pass or fail" checks a machine can run
Rubrics — the judgment calls that need a human or an AI reviewer to score against clear criteria
You're not staring at a blank page trying to guess how to verify your own spec. The tool proposes it alongside the spec itself.
Built for more than developers
You don't need to be a developer to use it. Right now the only way to sanity-check a spec against reality is to go read the source yourself.
We built EasySpecs so product managers and team leads get that confidence without opening a single file.
Try it
Free to start — connect a repo, bring your own AI key, see what it finds
Workbench — €5/repo/month while launch pricing lasts (normally €10)
Factory — €150/month if you want us to run the AI side too, with credits to use on any repo
I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially if you throw a messy, undocumented codebase at it. That's the case we built for.
Congratulations @xesca_i_am@carlos_guirao & team @easyspecs.ai 🚀. Question, Having written the specifications, what would be the way to keep them consistent with the changing source code? Manually running them, or keeping them constantly up-to-date?
Does it review the spec against the existing codebase, or the document on its own?
Can EasySpecs automatically detect gaps between specs and the existing codebase??
This is a really useful product for AI teams How do you see EasySpecs fitting into the dev workflow long term?
How do you keep the specs tied to the code over time, do they update automatically when the code changes?
Didn't know that these sort of tools existed. Excited to see this in action going forward
About easyspecs.ai on Product Hunt
“The spec review platform”
easyspecs.ai launched on Product Hunt on September 11th, 2026 and earned 146 upvotes and 23 comments, placing #6 on the daily leaderboard. The gap between 1.5x and 100x isn't speed, it's trust!! AI agents generate code 100x faster than humans write it. But your team can't review it all. EasySpecs documents undocumented codebases and turns them into trustworthy specifications, so spec review becomes your new merge request review. Ground your agents in reality. Scale agentic development without babysitting. Document the foundation once. Review specs including Oracles and Rubrics and Ship code you actually verified.
easyspecs.ai was featured in SaaS (44.1k followers), Developer Tools (519.1k followers) and Development (6.2k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 142.4k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted easyspecs.ai?
easyspecs.ai was hunted by Xesca. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how easyspecs.ai stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Xesca
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I'm Xesca, CTO turned founder. Before EasySpecs, I spent 15+ years being the person accountable for code I didn't personally write, across fintech, insurtech, and media.
That's the job now for every engineering leader: your agents ship code faster than anyone can read it, and you're still the one who answers for what breaks.
The problem
I kept hitting the same wall everywhere I looked:
Teams adopt AI coding agents, and PRs pile up faster than anyone can review them
Specs get written against a mental model of the codebase, not the actual codebase
Agents generate code against those specs
Things break silently, and nobody can trace why, because nobody documented what was actually there to begin with
Code review is dead. Spec review is where quality lives now. But spec review only works if the spec is grounded in reality, not guesswork.
What EasySpecs does
Two things, one workflow:
1. We document your codebase automatically
Even the undocumented, nobody-wants-to-touch-it kind. Our first real test was a pharmaceutical company's legacy Delphi system. If it works there, it works on whatever you're building.
2. We turn that understanding into specs your team and your agents can actually trust
Every spec comes paired with validators, so you know it matches the app before anyone codes against it.
Here's the part I'm most proud of: as you write a spec, the specs crafter suggests oracles and rubrics for it, concrete, checkable ways to verify the change actually did what the spec said.
Oracles — the "does this pass or fail" checks a machine can run
Rubrics — the judgment calls that need a human or an AI reviewer to score against clear criteria
You're not staring at a blank page trying to guess how to verify your own spec. The tool proposes it alongside the spec itself.
Built for more than developers
You don't need to be a developer to use it. Right now the only way to sanity-check a spec against reality is to go read the source yourself.
We built EasySpecs so product managers and team leads get that confidence without opening a single file.
Try it
Free to start — connect a repo, bring your own AI key, see what it finds
Workbench — €5/repo/month while launch pricing lasts (normally €10)
Factory — €150/month if you want us to run the AI side too, with credits to use on any repo
I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially if you throw a messy, undocumented codebase at it. That's the case we built for.