Agent-built code works but stops feeling like yours. Co-Review opens the whole repository as a review: comment on a line, file or folder, ask why, and the agent answers from the code. Also reviews diffs, PRs and designs. Free, open source, no telemetry.
I build with a coding agent most days. Each diff looked fine. Six months in, the codebase worked, but I couldn't tell you where things lived or why they were built that way. It had stopped being mine.
So I built the tool I wanted: open the entire repository as a review, the way you'd read a pull request, with the agent that wrote it sitting in the thread. Comment on a line, a function, a file or a whole folder and ask why. The agent answers from the code, not from memory of a chat.
What it does:
Whole-repository audit: the agent writes a guide to the map, vocabulary, flows and weak spots, with findings grouped by area. Coverage tracks what you've actually read.
Your change as a PR page: line comments, suggested edits, one verdict, and the agent acts on it.
Someone else's PR: the agent takes the first pass, you decide what goes back to the author, and it posts to GitHub as a real review with line comments.
Design before code: an L1/L2/L3 plan with Mermaid diagrams, revised from your comments before anything is built.
It's a review tool with IDE features, built on Eclipse Theia, so navigation, search, Git and language servers are the real thing and everything unrelated to reviewing is gone.
Made for Claude Code (one plugin install). Native packages for Pi and Oh My Pi. Any MCP agent works: Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Zed, OpenCode, Goose.
Free and MIT licensed. No account, no telemetry. Reviews live on your machine; your code goes only to the agent you chose.
does the agent keep its answer tied to the current commit, or can it drift if the code changes after you ask?
Congrats Sarath! "It had stopped being mine" is exactly the feeling. I built my Mac app largely with a coding agent, and reviewing diff by diff never gave me the map. Does the audit guide live in the repo as a file I can keep up to date, or inside Co-Review?
About Co-Review on Product Hunt
“Read the whole repository with the agent that built it”
Co-Review launched on Product Hunt on November 10th, 2026 and earned 94 upvotes and 8 comments, placing #8 on the daily leaderboard. Agent-built code works but stops feeling like yours. Co-Review opens the whole repository as a review: comment on a line, file or folder, ask why, and the agent answers from the code. Also reviews diffs, PRs and designs. Free, open source, no telemetry.
Co-Review was featured in Open Source (69.1k followers), Developer Tools (522.8k followers), Artificial Intelligence (483.3k followers) and GitHub (41.5k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 281.5k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted Co-Review?
Co-Review was hunted by Sarath SP. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how Co-Review stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Sarath SP
Hi Product Hunt, I'm Sarath, maker of Co-Review.
I build with a coding agent most days. Each diff looked fine. Six months in, the codebase worked, but I couldn't tell you where things lived or why they were built that way. It had stopped being mine.
So I built the tool I wanted: open the entire repository as a review, the way you'd read a pull request, with the agent that wrote it sitting in the thread. Comment on a line, a function, a file or a whole folder and ask why. The agent answers from the code, not from memory of a chat.
What it does:
It's a review tool with IDE features, built on Eclipse Theia, so navigation, search, Git and language servers are the real thing and everything unrelated to reviewing is gone.
Made for Claude Code (one plugin install). Native packages for Pi and Oh My Pi. Any MCP agent works: Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Zed, OpenCode, Goose.
Free and MIT licensed. No account, no telemetry. Reviews live on your machine; your code goes only to the agent you chose.
Two-minute walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmZ8NCNpLl8
Install:
curl -fsSL https://sdsvn.github.io/co-revie... | bash
I'd love to hear what you'd want to ask your own codebase. I'll be here all day.