Clark is an AI coworker with its own cloud computer - browser, terminal, files, and code. Hand it a real task, close the tab, and come back to finished work: wide, sourced research; websites; spreadsheets; decks; audits; or tested code. It can fan work out to parallel specialists, run on a schedule, and return artifacts with the evidence behind them. Use Clark on web or mobile, work in real repositories with Clark Code, or embed the agent through an OpenAI-compatible API.
Hey Product Hunt — I’m launching Clark Agent because AI still feels too much like a chat window.
Clark is built around a different model: give the AI its own cloud computer with a browser, terminal, files, code, and an async workspace. You send a task, leave, and come back to the artifact.
The jobs we care about are practical: browser research, website publishing, scheduled monitoring, document audits, decks, spreadsheets, and code patches. The key thing is that Clark returns files, screenshots, sources, logs, or URLs you can inspect.
I’d love feedback on three things:
1. What real task would you try first?
2. Does the “own cloud computer” idea come through clearly?
3. Where would you still hesitate to trust it?
the async model is the right call. most AI tools force you to babysit the process in real-time which defeats the purpose. curious how you handle the verification step though — when Clark finishes a research task, how does the user know the sources are solid without re-doing the work themselves?
This looks cool! Was wondering what the difference is between this and /loop on claude code? Can't cc agents run autonomously already?
Love that it actually hands you back evidence with the work, not just a wall of text. Closing the tab and coming back to a finished spreadsheet feels like cheating.
Love that Clark can fan work out to parallel specialists and hand back artifacts with sources. One thing I'd love is a simple "trust but verify" mode where I can quickly diff what Clark did against my own expectations before it writes to a repo or ships a spreadsheet, so I can catch small errors without babysitting the run.
the scheduled monitor use case is the one I'd want most out of this. when it re-runs on a timer, does it diff against the last artifact and surface only what changed, or hand back a fresh full artifact every time and leave the comparison to you?
the scheduled monitoring runs are the part I'd worry about most - if a recurring job silently starts failing (site changed, credentials expired) does it flag that as a failure or just quietly hand back a stale/empty artifact next run?
the scheduled monitoring use case is the interesting one - when a monitor job runs repeatedly, does it diff against the last run so you only get pinged on what changed, or does it hand back the full state fresh each time and you compare yourself?
How does the fan out to parallel specialists actually work, does Clark decide on its own how to split a task or do you have to define the sub agents ahead of time?
Moving from “answer my prompt” to “complete the work and return evidence” is the interesting shift here. For long-running tasks, how does Clark preserve the reasoning and context behind intermediate decisions so users can inspect more than just the final artifact?
the sandboxing/state questions above cover the trust side well. curious about the fan-out mechanic specifically - when Clark splits a task across parallel specialists, do they each get an isolated environment that gets merged into the final artifact, or do they share the same cloud computer/workspace while running concurrently? asking because shared-state parallelism is where I'd expect the weird bugs to show up first
an AI coworker with its own cloud computer is a wild framing. curious how you handle the case where it needs to install something or hit a paywall/captcha mid-task - does it just stall out and ping you, or does it have some way to work around that on its own?
Congrats on the launch! How does Clark compare to Hermes Agent deployed on a cloud computer? Does the workflow / tool-chain is built to be more complete towards problem-solving?
"Its own cloud computer" is a meaningfully different architecture than most AI-coworker tools that just call APIs — giving it a persistent environment changes what it can actually do end-to-end. Curious how you're handling security/sandboxing for that computer, especially once it's doing real multi-step tasks unsupervised. That's usually the part that keeps teams from trusting autonomous agents with anything consequential.
Congrats on the launch! How does Clark deal with existing internal systems that have messy or outdated APIs?
Congrats on the launch @stanislav_kirdey. How does Clark handle changes after an app is generated? Can it keep updating the app as requirements evolve?
Tried Clark on a task to gather information on investors and VCs. It came back with a clean, well-structured spreadsheet, relevant investor profiles, and source links attached for every data point. Made the initial research process much faster and easier to verify. Good Luck
@stanislav_kirdey Actually I appreciate the focus on real deliverables , websites, spreadsheets, research , code instead of just conversations. That's a practical vision . Best of luck with the launch.
I love products that save me context switching , and this looks like it could do exactly that . Looking forward to putting it through its paces.
Congrats on the launch. I like that it's async, you send a task and leave instead of babysitting the agent the whole way. My one nervous question before handing an agent a real repo: when Clark Code patches something while I'm gone, is it scoped to a branch or PR I get to review, or can it land straight on main? Trying to picture the blast radius before I point it at anything that matters.
About Clark on Product Hunt
“An AI coworker with its own cloud computer”
Clark launched on Product Hunt on July 18th, 2026 and earned 457 upvotes and 58 comments, earning #2 Product of the Day. Clark is an AI coworker with its own cloud computer - browser, terminal, files, and code. Hand it a real task, close the tab, and come back to finished work: wide, sourced research; websites; spreadsheets; decks; audits; or tested code. It can fan work out to parallel specialists, run on a schedule, and return artifacts with the evidence behind them. Use Clark on web or mobile, work in real repositories with Clark Code, or embed the agent through an OpenAI-compatible API.
Clark was featured in Productivity (656.3k followers), Developer Tools (516k followers) and Artificial Intelligence (473.8k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 330.5k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted Clark?
Clark was hunted by Ben Lang. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how Clark stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.