CitedSpy

Track your brand in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and More

Marketing

Artificial Intelligence

Visit WebsiteSee on Product HuntInstagram ⧉LinkedIn ⧉

AI visibility is quickly becoming as important as traditional search visibility. I like that this focuses on measurement first, because it's hard to improve something you can't consistently track across different models and prompts.

tracking brand mentions across ai answers is the new seo tbh 👀 do you do sentiment too?

How do you handle the randomness problem? Same question asked twice to ChatGPT can give different brand mentions. Are you running each prompt multiple times and averaging, or single run? That changes how much I can trust the numbers.

@arshita_sharma Congratulations. And happy product launch.

How stable are these rankings ? If I found out my competitor is recommended more often, what can I do to improve that ?

A lot of people asked us:

"How does CitedSpy compare with other GEO tools?"

So instead of answering one by one, we built a dedicated Alternatives hub.

Compare CitedSpy with the leading AI visibility platforms, understand the differences, and choose what fits your needs whether it's us or someone else.

Explore here: https://www.citedspy.com/alternatives

The note about turning down paid upvotes is honestly one of the strongest parts of this launch. building a product around authentic visibility, then refusing to manufacture that visibility on PH, makes the positioning much easier to trust :)

I've been thinking more about AI discoverability while building a product and its documentation, and the hardest part seems to be separating real visibility trends from normal answer variation. Curious how CitedSpy handles that across different models, prompts, locations, and repeated runs, and how it decides when a citation gap is actually meaningful enough to act on.

the measurement part makes sense, but I'm stuck on the action part - once you know your citation rate is low, what's the actual lever to pull? unlike classic SEO there's no sitemap to submit to an LLM, so is the fix really just "publish more content and hope it gets into the training/retrieval data", or is there something more direct you can do?

this is a category that's going to matter a lot more soon. how do you actually query the models - real API calls on some schedule, or sampling? asking because ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity answers aren't deterministic, so I'd guess you need a decent sample size per prompt before the citation rate number means anything

Does the tool also recommends what we should do to get more recommendations for them?

Being able to see the exact prompts that led to a mention would be a game changer, even if it's a sampled view. That way we could reverse engineer which question phrasings actually surface our brand versus the ones where we're invisible.

Ran CitedSpy on a small site I work with and was surprised how clear the gap reports were, showing exactly which queries ChatGPT was ignoring us on compared to competitors.

Really exciting to see CitedSpy live today. Big congratulations to everyone behind it! 🚀🚀

finally a tool that shows how often my brand shows up in ChatGPT and Perplexity responses, and the competitor comparison actually made me rethink our content priorities

Congrats on the launch! Does it actually track based on different locations? I know a few brands and a few prompts that respond differently in each location, like the same prompt responds differently in the USA and India. Does your product support this?

honestly the cross-platform tracking across all the major AI assistants in one dashboard is super clean, you know most tools only cover one or two and make you piece the rest together yourself

Finally, we're live on Product Hunt! 🚀

After months of building, countless conversations, and lots of iterations, CitedSpy is officially out in the world. We'd genuinely appreciate your support an upvote, comment, or share goes a long way in helping us reach more founders and marketers.

Thank you for being part of our journey! ❤️