Comparing AI models side-by-side isn't just a convenience—it’s a stress test for our design direction."
Congrats on the launch! We often talk about LLM benchmarks in text, but seeing Claude 4.6 and GPT-5.4's visual "taste" side-by-side on the same URL is incredibly insightful. The fact that this supports exports to Next.js and WordPress makes it a legitimate pro tool rather than just a mood-board generator.
One question: When redesigning based on a URL, how does Shuffle handle "Conversion Logic"? Does it simply focus on the visual facelift, or can we prompt it to prioritize specific UX goals like "increasing CTA visibility" across all models simultaneously?
Incredible ! and very generous free tier (I'm not affiliated, I just enjoyed using it)
I pasted one of my pages just to test it out and man... it was surprisingly useful when I saw multiple AI redesigns side by side. It's definitely a good way to quickly explore different design directions.
The parallel model approach is amazing. It is rare to see Claude and GPT working side-by-side like this.
I noticed a strategic risk on the page. You are selling More Options. However, for a business owner, more options usually means more indecision. I think your messaging misses a huge opportunity to talk about Selection Logic. If you show them how to pick the version that drives the most revenue, your retention will stay high.
I want to see this tool win.
The client pitch use case is clever. Generating multiple redesign directions in minutes instead of days of mockup work could save agencies a lot of time. Can you iterate on a specific model's output, or is it a one-shot generation?
Sounds interesting. Are you limited to some specific CMS, no-code website builders and frameworks, or its technology agnostic?
Interesting idea comparing multiple AI redesigns side-by-side. Seeing different model outputs for the same site could actually make design decisions much easier. Curious which models perform best for real-world websites.
Running Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Kimi side-by-side on the same URL turns model comparison from an abstract benchmark into something designers can actually evaluate visually in context. The client pitch use case is the killer angle here — showing three redesign directions generated in minutes beats spending a week on speculative mockups. Can you export the generated designs as editable code, or is it primarily for visual inspiration?
Dawid Andrzejewski
Hey 👋
We just added a new product with a multi-AI view: AI Website Redesign.
Paste a URL and see how leading AI models redesign it in real time.
The first users use it for:
✅ Redesigning outdated sites
✅ Pitching redesigns to clients
✅ Generating design inspiration
At the moment, it supports Claude Opus 4.6, GPT 5.4, Gemini 3.1, and Kimi 2.5
Share your prompts & results (each has a unique link), and we’ll post the best ones in example sections!