This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Paste any URL and get a score across the technical, content, and authority signals that decide whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini cite you — plus the exact fixes. Free scan, no signup.
I'm Vlad, a marketer from Berlin. Built aeo-audit.app because one thing kept bugging me: people ask ChatGPT and Perplexity for recommendations now — and most sites have no idea if AI even sees them. If it doesn't cite you, you don't exist for those people. No page 2 to check. You're just not in the answer.
So I reverse-engineered what these engines actually quote and turned it into a score.
The whole design goal was: useful from the first second. No signup wall, no onboarding, no "book a demo." Paste a URL and get something genuinely helpful for free — your score across Technical, Content, and Authority, plus the top fixes that'd actually move the needle. Low friction for you, low overhead for me — so the core stays free and simple, and the €29 is just there when you want the deep-dive: every gap, prioritized, with before/after rewrites across 50 audits.
I vibecoded this with Lovable and tested it the most direct way I could — ran the tool on its own site, fed its own advice back in, let it make the fixes. Round after round — about 30 audits before it hit a perfect score. Wanted to know if the advice actually worked, and if the whole diagnose -> fix -> re-score loop was real or just theater.
Started at 45. At one point it kept flagging something I knew I'd fixed — turned out to be a bug in my own extraction engine hiding content from crawlers. Dogfooding it caught real problems I'd never have found. Fixed the tool, not the score. It's 100/100/100 now. Before/after's on the page.
Not just my own tool grading itself either — Google's PageSpeed gives the site 3/3 on Agentic Browsing (their check for how well AI reads a page).
Next: going deeper on schema, and looking at the emerging agent standards (llms.txt, WebMCP) so you can see how ready your site is for AI agents, not just AI answers. Diagnose → fix, one place.
Give it a spin on your site. Looking forward to your questions and feedback 👇
No comment highlights available yet. Please check back later!
About aeo-audit.app on Product Hunt
“Check if AI recommends your website”
aeo-audit.app was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #101 on the daily leaderboard. Paste any URL and get a score across the technical, content, and authority signals that decide whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini cite you — plus the exact fixes. Free scan, no signup.
aeo-audit.app was featured in Marketing (467.7k followers), SEO (38.1k followers) and Artificial Intelligence (477.4k followers) on Product Hunt. Together, these topics include over 208.3k products, making this a competitive space to launch in.
Who hunted aeo-audit.app?
aeo-audit.app was hunted by Vlad Gabriel Radu. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Want to see how aeo-audit.app stacked up against nearby launches in real time? Check out the live launch dashboard for upvote speed charts, proximity comparisons, and more analytics.
Vlad Gabriel Radu
Hey PH 👋
I'm Vlad, a marketer from Berlin. Built aeo-audit.app because one thing kept bugging me: people ask ChatGPT and Perplexity for recommendations now — and most sites have no idea if AI even sees them. If it doesn't cite you, you don't exist for those people. No page 2 to check. You're just not in the answer.
So I reverse-engineered what these engines actually quote and turned it into a score.
The whole design goal was: useful from the first second. No signup wall, no onboarding, no "book a demo." Paste a URL and get something genuinely helpful for free — your score across Technical, Content, and Authority, plus the top fixes that'd actually move the needle. Low friction for you, low overhead for me — so the core stays free and simple, and the €29 is just there when you want the deep-dive: every gap, prioritized, with before/after rewrites across 50 audits.
I vibecoded this with Lovable and tested it the most direct way I could — ran the tool on its own site, fed its own advice back in, let it make the fixes. Round after round — about 30 audits before it hit a perfect score. Wanted to know if the advice actually worked, and if the whole diagnose -> fix -> re-score loop was real or just theater.
Started at 45. At one point it kept flagging something I knew I'd fixed — turned out to be a bug in my own extraction engine hiding content from crawlers. Dogfooding it caught real problems I'd never have found. Fixed the tool, not the score. It's 100/100/100 now. Before/after's on the page.
Not just my own tool grading itself either — Google's PageSpeed gives the site 3/3 on Agentic Browsing (their check for how well AI reads a page).
Next: going deeper on schema, and looking at the emerging agent standards (llms.txt, WebMCP) so you can see how ready your site is for AI agents, not just AI answers. Diagnose → fix, one place.
Give it a spin on your site. Looking forward to your questions and feedback 👇