AI coding tools generate frontends that look close, but never match the design. You end up spending hours fixing spacing, fonts, colors, and layout. Design-to-code plugins generate rigid code. Visual regression tools catch problems but don't fix them. Visdiff closes the loop: paste your Figma link, and AI agents generate, verify, and fix the code against your design reference until it actually matches. No more "close enough." What you designed is what gets shipped.
Hello Hunter👋🏻
I'm Mouad, one of the co-founders of Visdiff.
We ran a development agency and every single project had the same problem: a client hands us a Figma design, we use the best AI coding tools available (Cursor, Claude, v0), and the output is never pixel-perfect. We'd spend 3-5 hours per page manually fixing things that should have been right.
We talked to dozens of developers and designers, turns out everyone has this pain. Agencies, freelancers, in-house teams. The AI tools are amazing at generating code, but terrible at visual accuracy.
So we're building Visdiff: a visual diffing engine that sits between Figma and your codebase. It generates code, screenshots the result, compares it pixel-by-pixel to the original design, and iterates until it matches.
We're looking for developers who want to be first in line when we ship. If you've ever wasted hours fixing AI-generated code to match a design, we're building this for you.
Would love to hear: what's the most annoying visual bug you keep having to fix manually?
