This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Unwatch
Turn YouTube tutorials and playlists into readable lessons
Paste a YouTube video or playlist and get a written lesson with timestamps. Pick Learn (every concept, no filler), Read (full text) or Quick (revision notes). It adapts to coding, DevOps, frontend and exam-prep videos. Topics: Education, Productivity, Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools Links: https://unwatch.in https://youtu.be/iOoRvm06NYg
Hi Product Hunt, I'm Deepak, the maker of Unwatch.
I kept falling into tutorial hell: 10-hour playlists on C++, DevOps and GATE prep, played at 2x, and nothing stuck. Summarisers didn't help, because they drop the code and the worked examples, which are the whole point of a tutorial.
So Unwatch writes a lesson from the video instead of a summary:
• Learn: keeps every concept and example, removes intros and filler
• Read: the full explanation as text
• Quick: short revision notes
It shapes the lesson to the video type. Coding videos keep the code and explain it, and exam videos get practice questions and revision points. When the screen matters, it looks at the video itself, not just the captions. Every section has a timestamp that jumps back to that moment.
Playlists convert only the videos you click, so you don't waste hours on ones you skip.
From my tests on 11 videos, a Learn lesson takes about 43% of the video's length to read (range 12–75%). Quick notes take 7–15%. That's a small sample, and long messy lectures are still the hardest case. There's a "report a problem" button and I read every report.
I'd love to know two things: is Learn vs Read vs Quick clear from the landing page, and what would make you trust a generated lesson enough to study from it?
About Unwatch on Product Hunt
“Turn YouTube tutorials and playlists into readable lessons”
Unwatch was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #189 on the daily leaderboard. Paste a YouTube video or playlist and get a written lesson with timestamps. Pick Learn (every concept, no filler), Read (full text) or Quick (revision notes). It adapts to coding, DevOps, frontend and exam-prep videos. Topics: Education, Productivity, Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools Links: https://unwatch.in https://youtu.be/iOoRvm06NYg
On the analytics side, Unwatch competes within Productivity, Education and Developer Tools — topics that collectively have 1.3M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Unwatch performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Unwatch?
Unwatch was hunted by Deepak sharma. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Unwatch including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Deepak sharma
Hi Product Hunt, I'm Deepak, the maker of Unwatch.
I kept falling into tutorial hell: 10-hour playlists on C++, DevOps and GATE prep, played at 2x, and nothing stuck. Summarisers didn't help, because they drop the code and the worked examples, which are the whole point of a tutorial.
So Unwatch writes a lesson from the video instead of a summary:
• Learn: keeps every concept and example, removes intros and filler
• Read: the full explanation as text
• Quick: short revision notes
It shapes the lesson to the video type. Coding videos keep the code and explain it, and exam videos get practice questions and revision points. When the screen matters, it looks at the video itself, not just the captions. Every section has a timestamp that jumps back to that moment.
Playlists convert only the videos you click, so you don't waste hours on ones you skip.
From my tests on 11 videos, a Learn lesson takes about 43% of the video's length to read (range 12–75%). Quick notes take 7–15%. That's a small sample, and long messy lectures are still the hardest case. There's a "report a problem" button and I read every report.
I'd love to know two things: is Learn vs Read vs Quick clear from the landing page, and what would make you trust a generated lesson enough to study from it?