This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not yet shown by default on their landing page.
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Tribunite
AITA + League of Legends: Judge social cases with the crowd
Tribunite is a platform for judging messy social cases in a more structured way. Instead of reading comments first, you vote before seeing the community split. Each case can include multiple people, each with its own judgment question, so conflicts feel less one-sided than on typical drama forums. You can compare your take, join the discussion, and build a judge profile over time.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I’m building Tribunite for people who can’t resist judging messy social situations online - but who also get frustrated by how quickly comments shape the verdict before they’ve even formed their own opinion.
On most drama/advice forums, you usually get:
- one main person being judged
- comments that bias the reader immediately
- a lot of pile-on and oversimplified takes
With Tribunite, the idea is different:
- You judge before seeing the crowd’s verdict
- Each case can include multiple people, each with their own judgment question
- Results and discussion unlock after you vote
- You can track your progress over time through XP, levels, titles, streaks, and settled verdict accuracy
The goal is to make online judgment feel more structured, less one-sided, and honestly a lot more engaging.
This started as one of my first serious projects after noticing how addictive internet “who’s wrong here?” stories are - but also how limited the format usually is. What became most interesting while building it was not just the stories themselves, but the judging mechanic:
reading the full case, judging every side, and then seeing whether your instincts actually match the broader community.
Tribunite is especially for people who enjoy:
- AITA-style social cases
- moral / social judgment
- debating who handled a situation badly
- interactive, repeatable content loops instead of passive scrolling
I’d really love feedback on a few things:
- Does the judge-before-results flow feel compelling?
- Is the multi-person verdict structure more interesting than the usual one-sided format?
- What would make you come back regularly: better cases, stronger progression, more community features, or something else?
Thanks for checking it out - I’ll be around all day and happy to answer everything openly.
