This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Tribunal of Ideas
Everyone flatters your idea. We put it on trial.
Tribunal of Ideas puts your business idea on trial. Dozens of different AI models play prosecutor, defense, witnesses and a 12-model jury: they search the web for real evidence and competitors, debate live, and reach a calculated verdict, not just one AI's opinion. Walk away with a replayable trial, a shareable verdict card, and a full PDF report with an action plan.
I built Tribunal of Ideas because every time I asked someone (or ChatGPT) to review a business idea, I got the same thing back: encouragement. Friends are too polite, co-founders are optimistic, and AI assistants are built to be agreeable. Nobody actually tells you the truth.
The first version was just one AI giving an opinion, and it felt exactly like that problem: one more voice being nice to me. So I rebuilt it as an actual trial. A prosecutor and defense (different AI models) argue it out with real web evidence, witnesses testify for and against, and a 12-model jury scores it across 9 criteria, then cross-reviews each other anonymously before a formula calculates the verdict. No single model decides anything, and you watch the whole thing live.
To prove it isn't just talk, I did the most honest thing I could: I put this very idea on trial. It scored 81 (innocent). Then I appealed, refused to hand over my traction numbers, and my own tribunal dropped me to 78, with the judge calling my defense "clever but circular." Merciless, even with its own maker. That's the point: it's built to find the holes, not to make you feel good.
Would love your honest feedback here, and if you want to run your own idea through it, use code WELCOME20 for 20% off your first trial.
About Tribunal of Ideas on Product Hunt
“Everyone flatters your idea. We put it on trial.”
Tribunal of Ideas was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 2 comments, placing #120 on the daily leaderboard. Tribunal of Ideas puts your business idea on trial. Dozens of different AI models play prosecutor, defense, witnesses and a 12-model jury: they search the web for real evidence and competitors, debate live, and reach a calculated verdict, not just one AI's opinion. Walk away with a replayable trial, a shareable verdict card, and a full PDF report with an action plan.
On the analytics side, Tribunal of Ideas competes within SaaS, Artificial Intelligence and Business — topics that collectively have 524.6k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Tribunal of Ideas performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Tribunal of Ideas?
Tribunal of Ideas was hunted by Luciano Souza. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Tribunal of Ideas including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Luciano Souza
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I built Tribunal of Ideas because every time I asked someone (or ChatGPT) to review a business idea, I got the same thing back: encouragement. Friends are too polite, co-founders are optimistic, and AI assistants are built to be agreeable. Nobody actually tells you the truth.
The first version was just one AI giving an opinion, and it felt exactly like that problem: one more voice being nice to me. So I rebuilt it as an actual trial. A prosecutor and defense (different AI models) argue it out with real web evidence, witnesses testify for and against, and a 12-model jury scores it across 9 criteria, then cross-reviews each other anonymously before a formula calculates the verdict. No single model decides anything, and you watch the whole thing live.
To prove it isn't just talk, I did the most honest thing I could: I put this very idea on trial. It scored 81 (innocent). Then I appealed, refused to hand over my traction numbers, and my own tribunal dropped me to 78, with the judge calling my defense "clever but circular." Merciless, even with its own maker. That's the point: it's built to find the holes, not to make you feel good.
Would love your honest feedback here, and if you want to run your own idea through it, use code WELCOME20 for 20% off your first trial.