This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
ThinkReview
Agentic code reviews in your Pull Requests sidebar
Relaunched after 9 months, ThinkReview is now an agentic AI code review sidebar for GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket, including self-hosted versions. It adds full-repo context, custom review agents, summaries, bug/security checks, chat, and missing-test suggestions without CI setup, webhooks, bot accounts, or automatic PR comment spam.
Hey Product Hunt,
We first launched ThinkReview here around 9 months ago as a simple AI code review extension for GitLab merge requests. At the time, it only reviewed the diff, only supported GitLab, only used Gemini models, and had no custom review agents.
Since then, we rebuilt it into a much broader PR review workspace.
ThinkReview now adds agentic AI code review directly inside your GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket PR/MR sidebar. It supports both cloud and self-hosted versions of those platforms, can use full-repo context instead of only isolated diff hunks, and keeps AI review in a private sidebar instead of automatically posting bot comments into the PR.
What’s new since the first launch:
Full-repo context, not just the diff
Custom review agents for security, performance, API compatibility, accessibility, and team-specific checks
Multi-platform support: GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket
Self-hosted support for GitHub Enterprise, self-managed GitLab, Azure DevOps Server, and Bitbucket Data Center/Server
More model options: cloud models, OpenRouter, and local Ollama
No automatic PR comment spam: reviewers decide what gets posted
Zero setup: no CI config, webhooks, or bot accounts
I built ThinkReview this way because AI code review is most useful when it helps the reviewer think, not when it floods the PR with comments the team still has to triage.
The agent system is the biggest change. You can create specialized reviewers with their own instructions and references, then run them in separate sidebar tabs alongside the main review.
Would love feedback from developers and teams who review a lot of code:
Do you prefer AI review as automatic PR comments, or as a private sidebar first where the human reviewer stays in control?
About ThinkReview on Product Hunt
“Agentic code reviews in your Pull Requests sidebar”
ThinkReview was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 3 upvotes and 2 comments, placing #158 on the daily leaderboard. Relaunched after 9 months, ThinkReview is now an agentic AI code review sidebar for GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket, including self-hosted versions. It adds full-repo context, custom review agents, summaries, bug/security checks, chat, and missing-test suggestions without CI setup, webhooks, bot accounts, or automatic PR comment spam.
On the analytics side, ThinkReview competes within Chrome Extensions, Open Source, Developer Tools and GitHub — topics that collectively have 678.8k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how ThinkReview performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted ThinkReview?
ThinkReview was hunted by Jay Elsheikh. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Jay Elsheikh