This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio
No LLM. No invented DOIs. Just 13 registries and proof.
Verify every reference in your bibliography against 13 academic registries. No LLM, no invented DOIs — StrictCite adjudicates what the registries actually hold.
What inspired this: A paper on arXiv this year (Ansari, 2026) documented 100 fabricated citations that got past 3–5 expert reviewers each and were published at NeurIPS. Separate research on GPT-4 literature reviews found 18–28.6% of generated citations were entirely invented. That's not a rare failure — it's a predictable one, because an LLM is scoring plausibility, not checking a registry.
So I built the opposite of an AI citation tool: no LLM anywhere in the pipeline. StrictCite parses your bibliography, sends only the reference list (never your manuscript) to 13 real registries — Crossref, DataCite, OpenAlex, PubMed, arXiv, and others — and shows you exactly where they disagree with your citation, field by field.
The part that took longest to get right wasn't the lookups, it was deciding what "no record found" is allowed to mean. Early on I had it read as "probably fake," which is wrong and I knew it was wrong the first time it flagged a real, obscure paper that just predates DOIs. Now it's reported as unverified, never rejected — the report shows you which registries were asked and which had nothing, and you make the call.
It runs the check in your browser — the engine's compiled from Python to WebAssembly — so the only thing that ever leaves your machine is the reference list itself, not the paper you're writing.
Would genuinely like to hear where it gets a real citation wrong — that's the failure mode I care most about closing.
About StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio on Product Hunt
“No LLM. No invented DOIs. Just 13 registries and proof.”
StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #99 on the daily leaderboard. Verify every reference in your bibliography against 13 academic registries. No LLM, no invented DOIs — StrictCite adjudicates what the registries actually hold.
On the analytics side, StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio competes within Productivity, Education and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1.2M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio?
StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio was hunted by TuanBulut. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of StrictCite — Reference Audit Studio including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
TuanBulut