Your customers ask AI before they ask Google, and most brands have no idea whether they show up or lose to a competitor. Every other tool hands you a visibility score and stops there. Scribble does the whole loop: audit where you're invisible across every AI engine, create content that closes the gap, and amplify it through 50,000 creators who only get paid when AI cites them. A gap report won't win customers. Being the cited answer will.
I'm Kaavya, co-founder of Scribble Network. I've been a marketer and community builder for as long as I can remember, and have been deep in the GEO rabbit hole for a while now.
Two shifts got us here:
Creator and UGC budgets are eating into platform ad spend.
AI search loves to cite UGC when it builds an answer.
Which raised a question we couldn't drop:
Could money spent on creators actually move a brand's AI search visibility?
We tested it.
We were best suited to do this, because we started Scribble two years ago as a UGC platform with 50,000+ creators and over 100 campaigns run.
So we plugged that platform and creators into a homemade AI visibility intelligence tool and ran it on one client across 25 queries.
The tool generated content topics and gaps that the creators then made authentic content about on surfaces LLMs could read.
They were at around 2% aggregate visibility across the top 5 models. The market leader on the same queries was at 58%. Three months of steady UGC on the surfaces LLMs actually read, and that client now sits at roughly 25%.
That's when it clicked.
Every AI visibility tool out there could tell us we were invisible and where the answers came from. None could get us cited.
That's a distribution problem, but almost every AI Search product was treating it like a visibility problem
So we built the thing nobody else has: the first AI Search tool married to a creator platform.
We don't just measure your AI visibility, we fix it.
Our product attributes each brand mention back to the exact creator post that earned it.
And the platform now pays creators when they get cited. Creators love this.
This is our edge. We came at this from distribution and not measurement.
We never asked 'how do we track this?', we asked 'how do we actually get brands cited?'
The answer to this already lives in Scribble; try it on your own brand and tell me what you find.
Honest feedback wanted.
My co-founders and I are here all day answering everything.
About Scribble Network on Product Hunt
“The product that makes AI recommend your brand”
Scribble Network launched on Product Hunt on July 7th, 2026 and earned 297 upvotes and 88 comments, earning #2 Product of the Day. Your customers ask AI before they ask Google, and most brands have no idea whether they show up or lose to a competitor. Every other tool hands you a visibility score and stops there. Scribble does the whole loop: audit where you're invisible across every AI engine, create content that closes the gap, and amplify it through 50,000 creators who only get paid when AI cites them. A gap report won't win customers. Being the cited answer will.
On the analytics side, Scribble Network competes within Analytics, Marketing and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1.1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Scribble Network performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Scribble Network?
Scribble Network was hunted by Kevin William David. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Kevin William David
Hey Product Hunt Fam!
I'm Kaavya, co-founder of Scribble Network. I've been a marketer and community builder for as long as I can remember, and have been deep in the GEO rabbit hole for a while now.
Two shifts got us here:
Creator and UGC budgets are eating into platform ad spend.
AI search loves to cite UGC when it builds an answer.
Which raised a question we couldn't drop:
Could money spent on creators actually move a brand's AI search visibility?
We tested it.
We were best suited to do this, because we started Scribble two years ago as a UGC platform with 50,000+ creators and over 100 campaigns run.
So we plugged that platform and creators into a homemade AI visibility intelligence tool and ran it on one client across 25 queries.
The tool generated content topics and gaps that the creators then made authentic content about on surfaces LLMs could read.
They were at around 2% aggregate visibility across the top 5 models. The market leader on the same queries was at 58%. Three months of steady UGC on the surfaces LLMs actually read, and that client now sits at roughly 25%.
That's when it clicked.
Every AI visibility tool out there could tell us we were invisible and where the answers came from. None could get us cited.
That's a distribution problem, but almost every AI Search product was treating it like a visibility problem
So we built the thing nobody else has: the first AI Search tool married to a creator platform.
We don't just measure your AI visibility, we fix it.
Our product attributes each brand mention back to the exact creator post that earned it.
And the platform now pays creators when they get cited. Creators love this.
This is our edge. We came at this from distribution and not measurement.
We never asked 'how do we track this?', we asked 'how do we actually get brands cited?'
The answer to this already lives in Scribble; try it on your own brand and tell me what you find.
Honest feedback wanted.
My co-founders and I are here all day answering everything.