This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
RunVouch
The watchdog for unattended AI agents
Proof your scheduled AI agents did the job — and an alert the moment they don't, or start spending. RunVouch is the watchdog for agents that run while you sleep: Claude Code Routines, headless claude -p, OpenClaw, n8n, cron. Under the hood: dead man's switch, cost cap, outcome check. Eight detectors: MISSED, FAILED, NO_EVIDENCE (green ≠ done), RETRY_STORM, BUDGET, DRIFT, STALLED. Two lines around any job, Claude Code plugin, Python/Node clients, MCP server. Fails open. Free for 3 agents, MIT.
Two public cases got me building this: $1,800 in two nights of overnight Claude Code runs (issue #37686) and a $437 loop on one missing file. Both looked green in the logs.
Hi PH — I ran autonomous agents and a crypto trading bot unattended for two years. Every expensive failure was quiet: a routine that "succeeded" with an empty report, a loop that called the same tool 41 times, a bill that doubled overnight while the dashboard lagged a day.
Ping monitors (Healthchecks, Cronitor) know a job ran. Tracing platforms (Langfuse, LangSmith) need an SDK and a team. RunVouch is the missing middle for people who run agents unattended:
• MISSED / STALLED — the clock lives outside the agent, so silence is an alert • NO_EVIDENCE — a run only counts as done when a file changed, a URL returns 200, or your assertion passes. Anthropic's own docs say green ≠ succeeded. • RETRY_STORM — same tool + identical input 8× in one run • BUDGET — per-run and per-day cost caps, read from Claude Code transcripts • DRIFT — output size / duration off its 7-run baseline
Two lines around any job (rv run NAME -- your-command), a Claude Code plugin, Python/Node clients, and an MCP server in the official registry so your agents can check on each other. Fails open: if RunVouch is down, your job still runs. Free for 3 agents, no card; MIT self-host.
Which failure mode am I missing? Genuinely want to know.
About RunVouch on Product Hunt
“The watchdog for unattended AI agents”
RunVouch was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #8 on the daily leaderboard. Proof your scheduled AI agents did the job — and an alert the moment they don't, or start spending. RunVouch is the watchdog for agents that run while you sleep: Claude Code Routines, headless claude -p, OpenClaw, n8n, cron. Under the hood: dead man's switch, cost cap, outcome check. Eight detectors: MISSED, FAILED, NO_EVIDENCE (green ≠ done), RETRY_STORM, BUDGET, DRIFT, STALLED. Two lines around any job, Claude Code plugin, Python/Node clients, MCP server. Fails open. Free for 3 agents, MIT.
On the analytics side, RunVouch competes within SaaS, Developer Tools and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how RunVouch performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted RunVouch?
RunVouch was hunted by RunVouch. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of RunVouch including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
RunVouch
Two public cases got me building this: $1,800 in two nights of overnight Claude Code runs (issue #37686) and a $437 loop on one missing file. Both looked green in the logs.
Hi PH — I ran autonomous agents and a crypto trading bot unattended for two years. Every expensive failure was quiet: a routine that "succeeded" with an empty report, a loop that called the same tool 41 times, a bill that doubled overnight while the dashboard lagged a day.
Ping monitors (Healthchecks, Cronitor) know a job ran. Tracing platforms (Langfuse, LangSmith) need an SDK and a team. RunVouch is the missing middle for people who run agents unattended:
• MISSED / STALLED — the clock lives outside the agent, so silence is an alert
• NO_EVIDENCE — a run only counts as done when a file changed, a URL returns 200, or your assertion passes. Anthropic's own docs say green ≠ succeeded.
• RETRY_STORM — same tool + identical input 8× in one run
• BUDGET — per-run and per-day cost caps, read from Claude Code transcripts
• DRIFT — output size / duration off its 7-run baseline
Two lines around any job (rv run NAME -- your-command), a Claude Code plugin, Python/Node clients, and an MCP server in the official registry so your agents can check on each other. Fails open: if RunVouch is down, your job still runs. Free for 3 agents, no card; MIT self-host.
Which failure mode am I missing? Genuinely want to know.