This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
ReadmeRoast
Your README gets roasted. Your repo gets better.
Paste a public GitHub repo. Claude roasts your README like a comedy-club guest of honor: a Burn Rating out of 100, a set list of brutal-but-useful critiques, and a fully rewritten README you can copy and ship tonight. Free, no signup.
I built ReadmeRoast in a weekend after a humbling realization: I'd spent months building projects, and my READMEs were quietly sabotaging all of them. The repo IS the landing page — and mine read like commit messages with ambition. So I built the reviewer I needed: paste any public GitHub repo, and it delivers a comedy-club roast — a Burn Rating out of 100, a "set list" of critiques, and the part that actually matters: a complete rewritten README you can copy and ship immediately. Every burn comes with a fix.
First thing I did was point it at my own security project. It scored 62/100 and called it "a TED talk that forgot to mention where you buy tickets." It flagged my missing license and absent install instructions. It was right. I fixed both. That's the whole loop: roast → fix → ship.
Under the hood it's deliberately boring: a single-page Next.js app, one serverless route, Claude via Vercel's AI Gateway, no database, no signup, MIT-licensed on GitHub. My ask: roast your own repo and tell me the harshest line it gave you — best burn in the comments gets a place of honor and if it breaks on some cursed README format, tell me; I'll be fixing things live all day.
“Your README gets roasted. Your repo gets better.”
ReadmeRoast was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 4 upvotes and 3 comments, placing #160 on the daily leaderboard. Paste a public GitHub repo. Claude roasts your README like a comedy-club guest of honor: a Burn Rating out of 100, a set list of brutal-but-useful critiques, and a fully rewritten README you can copy and ship tonight. Free, no signup.
On the analytics side, ReadmeRoast competes within Developer Tools, Artificial Intelligence and GitHub — topics that collectively have 1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how ReadmeRoast performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted ReadmeRoast?
ReadmeRoast was hunted by Karthikeyan s. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of ReadmeRoast including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Hey Product Hunt! 👋
I built ReadmeRoast in a weekend after a humbling realization: I'd spent months building projects, and my READMEs were quietly sabotaging all of them. The repo IS the landing page — and mine read like commit messages with ambition.
So I built the reviewer I needed: paste any public GitHub repo, and it delivers a comedy-club roast — a Burn Rating out of 100, a "set list" of critiques, and the part that actually matters: a complete rewritten README you can copy and ship immediately. Every burn comes with a fix.
First thing I did was point it at my own security project. It scored 62/100 and called it "a TED talk that forgot to mention where you buy tickets." It flagged my missing license and absent install instructions. It was right. I fixed both. That's the whole loop: roast → fix → ship.
Under the hood it's deliberately boring: a single-page Next.js app, one serverless route, Claude via Vercel's AI Gateway, no database, no signup, MIT-licensed on GitHub.
My ask: roast your own repo and tell me the harshest line it gave you — best burn in the comments gets a place of honor and if it breaks on some cursed README format, tell me; I'll be fixing things live all day.
🔥 https://readme-roast.vercel.app