In-Depth Reviews capture what real makers and users think about the tools they rely on. Each review highlights the best and worst features, answers product-specific questions, and includes what the reviewer built using the product.
I can download and try all of them. There are around 4,931 AI code editors out there, and I’ve tried about 27% of them.
But trying a product for a day or two doesn’t tell the full story. Living with it for months or years does. I started using Cursor almost 2 years now. Then I switched to @Windsurf. Then I ran Claude Code inside Windsurf. After, I used Claude Code inside Cursor. And now I am (mostly) back on Cursor. With Cursor, I know the upsides (in-editor shortcuts and diffs fantastic), the downside (Auto model mode is so verbose), and the history (Agent mode wasn’t there in 2023). If someone is interested in trying Cursor, I can answer in depth questions (yes, sometimes I force gpt-5 on a particularly tough problem) to help them decide if they should try Cursor or an alternative.
That’s exactly what In-Depth Reviews aim to do: capture the hard-won, practical knowledge living in people’s heads. There is a Cambrian explosion of software thanks to AI assistants. Since you are reading this and you are a Product Hunt community member, you are an expert in at least one software product you love. Write a detailed review for it. Or write a review on Product Hunt Reviews (inception, I know). We would love to hear what you think.
What AI code assistant should I invest my time in? @Cursor? @Claude Code? @opencode? Something else?
I can download and try all of them. There are around 4,931 AI code editors out there, and I’ve tried about 27% of them.
But trying a product for a day or two doesn’t tell the full story. Living with it for months or years does. I started using Cursor almost 2 years now. Then I switched to @Windsurf. Then I ran Claude Code inside Windsurf. After, I used Claude Code inside Cursor. And now I am (mostly) back on Cursor. With Cursor, I know the upsides (in-editor shortcuts and diffs fantastic), the downside (Auto model mode is so verbose), and the history (Agent mode wasn’t there in 2023). If someone is interested in trying Cursor, I can answer in depth questions (yes, sometimes I force gpt-5 on a particularly tough problem) to help them decide if they should try Cursor or an alternative.
That’s exactly what In-Depth Reviews aim to do: capture the hard-won, practical knowledge living in people’s heads. There is a Cambrian explosion of software thanks to AI assistants. Since you are reading this and you are a Product Hunt community member, you are an expert in at least one software product you love. Write a detailed review for it. Or write a review on Product Hunt Reviews (inception, I know). We would love to hear what you think.