This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
May or Shall
Human judgment first. AI drafting follows.
Read, highlight the lines that matter and keep every source. Link them across documents, then let ChatGPT draft from your own lines, so each sentence can be checked against the page it came from. Chrome extension, website, desktop app and ChatGPT app.
Legal AI has learned to summarise. But has it learned how lawyers think?
Most legal AI tools make summarising, retrieving and drafting faster, whereas faster summaries do not necessarily produce better legal reasoning, and AI can still misread context or miss what matters. The real craft of law lies in judgment, i.e. reading, identifying what matters, spotting contradictions and connecting facts to the argument they shape, and one basic way lawyers exercise that judgment is simple: they read and they highlight.
That is where "May or Shall" begins. You highlight the passages that matter, each keeps its page and paragraph, you can link them across documents, and those selections become the foundation for drafting with ChatGPT. The lawyer brings the judgment and AI helps turn that judgment into structured legal work.
It works as a Chrome extension, a website, a desktop app for Windows and Mac, and inside ChatGPT. To try it in a minute, open the sample case or play Catch the AI on the front page.
I would value your honest view: does starting with your own highlights make the draft better?
About May or Shall on Product Hunt
“Human judgment first. AI drafting follows.”
May or Shall was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #382 on the daily leaderboard. Read, highlight the lines that matter and keep every source. Link them across documents, then let ChatGPT draft from your own lines, so each sentence can be checked against the page it came from. Chrome extension, website, desktop app and ChatGPT app.
On the analytics side, May or Shall competes within Productivity, Legal and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1.2M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how May or Shall performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted May or Shall?
May or Shall was hunted by Sidharth Kapoor. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of May or Shall including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Sidharth Kapoor
Hey Product Hunt,
Legal AI has learned to summarise. But has it learned how lawyers think?
Most legal AI tools make summarising, retrieving and drafting faster, whereas faster summaries do not necessarily produce better legal reasoning, and AI can still misread context or miss what matters. The real craft of law lies in judgment, i.e. reading, identifying what matters, spotting contradictions and connecting facts to the argument they shape, and one basic way lawyers exercise that judgment is simple: they read and they highlight.
That is where "May or Shall" begins. You highlight the passages that matter, each keeps its page and paragraph, you can link them across documents, and those selections become the foundation for drafting with ChatGPT. The lawyer brings the judgment and AI helps turn that judgment into structured legal work.
It works as a Chrome extension, a website, a desktop app for Windows and Mac, and inside ChatGPT. To try it in a minute, open the sample case or play Catch the AI on the front page.
I would value your honest view: does starting with your own highlights make the draft better?