This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Lucidra
API traffic, tests and Git in one local-first workspace
Lucidra is a local-first API engineering workspace for Linux, macOS and Windows. Build and send HTTP, GraphQL, WebSocket, Socket.IO, gRPC and SSE requests. Receive webhooks, tunnel public traffic to localhost and inspect email. Trace HTTP/HTTPS, match captures to saved requests and review differences. Turn real flows into suites, async scenarios and regressions; add mocks, contracts, Docs, visual Git and permissioned MCP for AI agents. Personal workspaces are free and need no account.
I built Lucidra because a successful API response often did not mean the integration worked. The failure might appear later in a webhook, retry, captured exchange, contract or code change, and I was tracing that story across separate tools. Lucidra keeps Requests, Receive (Capture, Tunnel and Email), HTTP/HTTPS Trace, suites, async scenarios, regressions, mocks, contracts, Docs, visual Git and permissioned MCP in one local-first workspace. Personal workspaces are free and require no account, with installers for Linux, macOS and Windows. This is my first product and an early beta. I would value candid feedback: does connecting observed traffic, saved definitions, test evidence and source changes reduce context switching? Which workflow would you keep, and what would you remove?
About Lucidra on Product Hunt
“API traffic, tests and Git in one local-first workspace”
Lucidra was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #71 on the daily leaderboard. Lucidra is a local-first API engineering workspace for Linux, macOS and Windows. Build and send HTTP, GraphQL, WebSocket, Socket.IO, gRPC and SSE requests. Receive webhooks, tunnel public traffic to localhost and inspect email. Trace HTTP/HTTPS, match captures to saved requests and review differences. Turn real flows into suites, async scenarios and regressions; add mocks, contracts, Docs, visual Git and permissioned MCP for AI agents. Personal workspaces are free and need no account.
On the analytics side, Lucidra competes within API, Software Engineering and Developer Tools — topics that collectively have 661k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Lucidra performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Lucidra?
Lucidra was hunted by Jakson Lucas. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Lucidra including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Jakson Lucas
I built Lucidra because a successful API response often did not mean the integration worked. The failure might appear later in a webhook, retry, captured exchange, contract or code change, and I was tracing that story across separate tools. Lucidra keeps Requests, Receive (Capture, Tunnel and Email), HTTP/HTTPS Trace, suites, async scenarios, regressions, mocks, contracts, Docs, visual Git and permissioned MCP in one local-first workspace. Personal workspaces are free and require no account, with installers for Linux, macOS and Windows. This is my first product and an early beta. I would value candid feedback: does connecting observed traffic, saved definitions, test evidence and source changes reduce context switching? Which workflow would you keep, and what would you remove?