The designer for your AI agents (Openclaw, CC, Codex)
Lokuma Design Agent, is an AI designer your agents can call, a design intelligence layer for agents like OpenClaw, Claude Code, or Codex. AI can generate almost anything. But generation isn’t design. Turning raw outputs into something clear, structured, and visually refined still requires design thinking. Built by design tool makers, Lokuma helps AI reason about layout, typography, and visual balance — transforming outputs into landing pages, websites, and campaign pages that feel designed.
Before this, I built Readdy and Creatie — tools used by over 500,000 designers and creators. Most of my work has been around design systems and how products actually feel, not just how they function.
This time, I’m working with a small indie team — a mix of designers, AI researchers, and people from growth and marketing.
Recently, something started to shift.
Tools like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and even things like Google Stitch, are changing how software gets built.
We’re no longer just using tools ourselves.
We’re starting to work with AI, and AI is starting to use tools on our behalf.
That changes the interface.
The new “user” of many tools is no longer a human - it’s an agent.
And most tools today aren’t built for that.
AI can generate almost anything. But generation isn’t design.
What we see today, including a lot of outputs from varied AI agents, is that AI can produce UI, code, layouts very quickly. But the results often lack structure, hierarchy, and visual coherence.
They work. But they don’t feel designed.
That gap becomes much more obvious when AI is the one building.
So we started thinking:
If agents are going to build products, they need something closer to a designer, instead of just another generator.
That’s why we built Lokuma Design Agent.
It’s a design intelligence layer for AI - something your agents can call to reason about layout, typography, hierarchy, and visual balance.
Your AI handles logic and generation. Lokuma handles how it actually comes together.
Why now?
Because we’re entering an agent-first stack. Coding has agents. Research has agents. Execution has agents.
Design is still missing.
Why us?
Because our team brings together experience across design tools, real product building, AI systems, and growth.
We’ve spent years understanding what makes interfaces actually feel right, and now we’re translating that into something AI can use.
We’re still early, just a small indie team moving fast. But this feels like a new category: tools built not for humans, but for AI.
Curious how others here see it:
If your AI is already writing code, what’s still missing for it to ship something that feels complete?
Hi Product Hunt,
I’m Mu, founder of Lokuma.
Before this, I built Readdy and Creatie — tools used by over 500,000 designers and creators. Most of my work has been around design systems and how products actually feel, not just how they function.
This time, I’m working with a small indie team — a mix of designers, AI researchers, and people from growth and marketing.
Recently, something started to shift.
Tools like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and even things like Google Stitch, are changing how software gets built.
We’re no longer just using tools ourselves.
We’re starting to work with AI, and AI is starting to use tools on our behalf.
That changes the interface.
The new “user” of many tools is no longer a human - it’s an agent.
And most tools today aren’t built for that.
AI can generate almost anything.
But generation isn’t design.
What we see today, including a lot of outputs from varied AI agents, is that AI can produce UI, code, layouts very quickly.
But the results often lack structure, hierarchy, and visual coherence.
They work.
But they don’t feel designed.
That gap becomes much more obvious when AI is the one building.
So we started thinking:
If agents are going to build products,
they need something closer to a designer, instead of just another generator.
That’s why we built Lokuma Design Agent.
It’s a design intelligence layer for AI - something your agents can call to reason about layout, typography, hierarchy, and visual balance.
Your AI handles logic and generation.
Lokuma handles how it actually comes together.
Why now?
Because we’re entering an agent-first stack.
Coding has agents. Research has agents. Execution has agents.
Design is still missing.
Why us?
Because our team brings together experience across design tools, real product building, AI systems, and growth.
We’ve spent years understanding what makes interfaces actually feel right, and now we’re translating that into something AI can use.
We’re still early, just a small indie team moving fast. But this feels like a new category:
tools built not for humans, but for AI.
Curious how others here see it:
If your AI is already writing code,
what’s still missing for it to ship something that feels complete?
— Mu