This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Lelu-ai
Stop manipulated AI agents before they act
AI agents now take real actions—refunds, emails, deploys. Existing tools secure WHO an agent is (OAuth/identity); none answer whether an authorized agent is being manipulated right now. Lelu is the behavioral layer that authorizes every tool call before it runs—catching prompt injection and low-confidence actions. Confidence comes from the model's logprobs, not a number the agent can fake. Four outcomes: allow, deny, human-review, or a safe alternative. Open source & self-hosted.
Hey Product Hunt! 👋 I'm Abenezer, the maker of Lelu-ai.
I build AI agents and train models, and the thing that kept nagging me was the asymmetry: everyone's racing to give agents more power — more tools, more autonomy — and almost no one is building the brakes. When an agent gets it wrong, it's not a typo. It's a refund issued, a record deleted, an email sent to the wrong person — instant and irreversible. And "the model was confident" is no defense.
So I built Lelu: a safety layer that authorizes every agent action before it runs. It catches prompt injection, gates on the model's real confidence, and routes uncertain calls to a human — returning allow, deny, human-review, or a safe alternative.
The one insight behind it: you can't trust an agent's self-reported confidence — a manipulated agent will happily claim it's 100% sure. So Lelu derives confidence from the model's token log-probabilities, something the agent can't fake.
It's fully open source (MIT) and self-hosted — your data never leaves your infra. Works with LangChain, CrewAI, MCP, and Amazon Bedrock out of the box.
I'd genuinely love your feedback — especially from folks running agents in production: how do you decide when an agent is "sure enough" to take an irreversible action? PRs and issues are very welcome too. 🙏
Repo: github.com/lelu-auth/lelu
About Lelu-ai on Product Hunt
“Stop manipulated AI agents before they act”
Lelu-ai was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #15 on the daily leaderboard. AI agents now take real actions—refunds, emails, deploys. Existing tools secure WHO an agent is (OAuth/identity); none answer whether an authorized agent is being manipulated right now. Lelu is the behavioral layer that authorizes every tool call before it runs—catching prompt injection and low-confidence actions. Confidence comes from the model's logprobs, not a number the agent can fake. Four outcomes: allow, deny, human-review, or a safe alternative. Open source & self-hosted.
On the analytics side, Lelu-ai competes within API, Developer Tools, Artificial Intelligence and GitHub — topics that collectively have 1.1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Lelu-ai performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Lelu-ai?
Lelu-ai was hunted by Abenezer. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Lelu-ai including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.