This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet.
It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Product comments vs the next 3
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Product upvotes and comments
Product vs the next 3
Launching qaonfire.dev
AI QA reports on every pull request
QAOnFire reads your GitHub pull request and posts a tailored QA report as a comment: manual test scenarios, edge cases, setup & verification scripts, and risk areas — written for the actual diff, not a generic checklist. 5 free PRs per month.
Top comment
Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm the maker of QAOnFire. Quick story on why this exists: I was a contractor on a 4-person team with no dedicated QA. Bugs reached prod because the developer who wrote the PR also "tested" it — which means they tested what they thought it should do, not what users would actually do. We needed a tester, but we didn't need a full-time tester, and we definitely didn't have time to write detailed manual test cases for every PR by hand. So I built QAOnFire. It's a GitHub App that: → Reads your PR (diff + selected file contents) → Reads your repo's `qabot.md` if you have one (domain terms, risk areas) → Posts a single comment with manual test scenarios, edge cases, setup & verification scripts, and PM notes for non-technical stakeholders A few things that made it actually useful (rather than generic AI noise): 1. The qabot.md file. Without project context, AI test plans drift toward "test the happy path." With a 20-line qabot.md, the scenarios reference YOUR roles, YOUR business rules, YOUR data. And you don't start from a blank file — comment `/qaonfire init` and QAOnFire generates the qabot.md from your README and docs, then opens it as a PR to review and merge. 2. Prompt caching. Repeat PRs on the same repo cost ~10x less in tokens, so we can afford to give 5 free reports/month per install. 3. The PM notes section. Product managers don't read code — but they read PR comments. Giving them a "user-facing impact" + "release-note candidate" summary makes them stop pinging engineers in Slack. Free tier is 5 PRs/month, no card required. Paid is $49/mo for 50 PRs or $149/mo for 200. Cancel from any Stripe receipt email. I'd love feedback on the qabot.md format especially — drop a comment with what you'd want a QA agent to do that this doesn't yet. Install: https://github.com/apps/qaonfire... Site: https://qaonfire.dev
About Launching qaonfire.dev on Product Hunt
“AI QA reports on every pull request”
Launching qaonfire.dev was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #88 on the daily leaderboard. QAOnFire reads your GitHub pull request and posts a tailored QA report as a comment: manual test scenarios, edge cases, setup & verification scripts, and risk areas — written for the actual diff, not a generic checklist. 5 free PRs per month.
On the analytics side, Launching qaonfire.dev competes within GitHub — topics that collectively have 41.3k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Launching qaonfire.dev performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Launching qaonfire.dev?
Launching qaonfire.dev was hunted by Radu Ghetu. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Launching qaonfire.dev including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.