This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Ditch the spreadsheets. Labrador guides accessibility consultants and learners through manual WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 audits. Test by page, component, or user journey, log issues with evidence as you go, then export client-ready, accessible HTML reports, plus DOCX, CSV, and VPAT. Its Chrome extension adds axe-core scans and AI remediation help. Track retests as versions and add custom fields to every issue. Jira sync on paid plans, with status flowing both ways. Free plan, no credit card required.
Grant Broome and I built Labrador for two reasons:
1. We couldn't find another manual accessibility tool that actually worked, and... 2. We hate spreadsheets.
Right now, some of the most important accessibility work at some of the biggest enterprise corporations lives in spreadsheets. Navigating a spreadsheet with 100s of issues, screenshots, and code evidence cobbled in is a pain. It's easy to lose track of what you've tested on which pages. Spreadsheets have no good answer for versioning, and they can't integrate two ways with Jira, making them a poor fit for the back and forth between developers and accessibility specialists. A spreadsheet cannot take an issue description, success criterion name, and target element code and generate remediation recommendations.
And that's the end of my rant on spreadsheets. Sorry to all the spreadsheet lovers out there, but they just weren't meant for accessibility auditing. Labrador is.
Labrador was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #139 on the daily leaderboard. Ditch the spreadsheets. Labrador guides accessibility consultants and learners through manual WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 audits. Test by page, component, or user journey, log issues with evidence as you go, then export client-ready, accessible HTML reports, plus DOCX, CSV, and VPAT. Its Chrome extension adds axe-core scans and AI remediation help. Track retests as versions and add custom fields to every issue. Jira sync on paid plans, with status flowing both ways. Free plan, no credit card required.
On the analytics side, Labrador competes within SaaS, Developer Tools and Inclusivity — topics that collectively have 563.6k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Labrador performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Labrador?
Labrador was hunted by Sam Donnelly. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Labrador including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Grant Broome and I built Labrador for two reasons:
1. We couldn't find another manual accessibility tool that actually worked, and...
2. We hate spreadsheets.
Right now, some of the most important accessibility work at some of the biggest enterprise corporations lives in spreadsheets. Navigating a spreadsheet with 100s of issues, screenshots, and code evidence cobbled in is a pain. It's easy to lose track of what you've tested on which pages. Spreadsheets have no good answer for versioning, and they can't integrate two ways with Jira, making them a poor fit for the back and forth between developers and accessibility specialists. A spreadsheet cannot take an issue description, success criterion name, and target element code and generate remediation recommendations.
And that's the end of my rant on spreadsheets. Sorry to all the spreadsheet lovers out there, but they just weren't meant for accessibility auditing. Labrador is.