This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Kurate.org
AI-powered scientific paper rankings
Spot Tomorrow’s Science Today! AI-powered scientific paper rankings. Running a paper tournament, LLMs judge which preprints (arXiv) have the highest potential impact across Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Robotics, Quantum Physics, Economics, and more. Arena for scientific papers.
Scientific publishing is broken. Peer review takes months, reviewers are underpaid and overloaded, and the publish-or-perish culture along with AI-assisted writing leads to a flood of daily preprints (almost 1,000 preprints on arXiv.org alone). The result: important papers get buried, mediocre ones get accepted at top venues, and researchers spend more time gaming the system than doing science.
Kurate is inspired by LMArena's approach to ranking LLMs through head-to-head comparisons.
How it works: Every new arXiv preprint from multiple scientific disciplines gets an AI-generated impact assessment, then papers are paired up and three LLM judges (GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3 Pro) vote on which has higher scientific impact. Thousands of these pairwise matches produce ranked leaderboards with Elo-style scores.
See https://kurate.org/methodology for more details.
Claude Opus 4.6 dominates as both summarizer and judge. It's the only model that uses the full 1–10 score range (GPT and Gemini cluster everything at 7–8) and creates very few inconsistencies through intransitive loops (from A>B and B>C it should follow A>C).
See https://kurate.org/correlation for more.
First validation tests on ICLR datasets have shown promising correlation (ρ = 0.6–0.7) with human reviewers and program committees. See the ongoing validation at https://kurate.org/validation?v=...
Kurate and the validation in particular are still a work in progress. Would love feedback, especially from researchers. Does this match your intuition about paper quality?
About Kurate.org on Product Hunt
“AI-powered scientific paper rankings”
Kurate.org was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 1 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #109 on the daily leaderboard. Spot Tomorrow’s Science Today! AI-powered scientific paper rankings. Running a paper tournament, LLMs judge which preprints (arXiv) have the highest potential impact across Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Robotics, Quantum Physics, Economics, and more. Arena for scientific papers.
On the analytics side, Kurate.org competes within Artificial Intelligence, Tech and Science — topics that collectively have 1.1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Kurate.org performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Kurate.org?
Kurate.org was hunted by Robert Lauko. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Kurate.org including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Robert Lauko