This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
FairHire
Catch risky job-post language before it becomes a lawsuit
Paste a job posting. FairHire flags compliance risks, quoting the exact phrase and the requirement it may miss (pay transparency, EEO, age-coded language). Built for solo recruiters, with free anonymous audits and plans from $29/mo vs $14k/yr enterprise tools.
Hey Product Hunt, Gabriel here, solo founder of FairHire.
I recruited for 7 years at Amazon and Grupo Bimbo. We had the expensive tools, and compliance was still a Word doc SOP nobody kept current. When I left, I kept thinking about everyone who doesn't even get the expensive tools, the solo recruiters, small agencies, and founders writing their own postings, while 18 states plus DC pile on pay transparency laws with real penalties behind them.
So FairHire is deliberately simple. Paste a job post, and it shows you the risky phrases, quoting each one exactly, with the requirement it may not meet. It never says "illegal." It shows you what it sees and lets you decide. I think that honesty is the product.
One number that surprised even me. Of 480 live job postings we've audited in production, 321, or 66.9%, had at least one flag. 866 flags total. And the top issues aren't exotic. Missing key sections (231), no EEO statement (190), no salary range (181). Most job posts aren't recklessly wrong, they're just unmaintained. Like that Word doc.
You can try it anonymously, no signup, 3 audits a day. I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially from recruiters and founders. What would make you trust a tool like this enough to run every posting through it? What's missing? Brutal honesty welcome, I'm one person and I ship fast.
About FairHire on Product Hunt
“Catch risky job-post language before it becomes a lawsuit”
FairHire was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 2 comments, placing #103 on the daily leaderboard. Paste a job posting. FairHire flags compliance risks, quoting the exact phrase and the requirement it may miss (pay transparency, EEO, age-coded language). Built for solo recruiters, with free anonymous audits and plans from $29/mo vs $14k/yr enterprise tools.
On the analytics side, FairHire competes within Hiring, SaaS and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 532.3k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how FairHire performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted FairHire?
FairHire was hunted by New User. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of FairHire including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
New User
Hey Product Hunt, Gabriel here, solo founder of FairHire.
I recruited for 7 years at Amazon and Grupo Bimbo. We had the expensive tools, and compliance was still a Word doc SOP nobody kept current. When I left, I kept thinking about everyone who doesn't even get the expensive tools, the solo recruiters, small agencies, and founders writing their own postings, while 18 states plus DC pile on pay transparency laws with real penalties behind them.
So FairHire is deliberately simple. Paste a job post, and it shows you the risky phrases, quoting each one exactly, with the requirement it may not meet. It never says "illegal." It shows you what it sees and lets you decide. I think that honesty is the product.
One number that surprised even me. Of 480 live job postings we've audited in production, 321, or 66.9%, had at least one flag. 866 flags total. And the top issues aren't exotic. Missing key sections (231), no EEO statement (190), no salary range (181). Most job posts aren't recklessly wrong, they're just unmaintained. Like that Word doc.
You can try it anonymously, no signup, 3 audits a day. I'd genuinely love your feedback, especially from recruiters and founders. What would make you trust a tool like this enough to run every posting through it? What's missing? Brutal honesty welcome, I'm one person and I ship fast.