This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
EvidenceFlow
Systematic reviews from screening to meta-analysis
EvidenceFlow is a free-to-use evidence synthesis workspace for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Build PICO questions, run blinded multi-reviewer screening, resolve conflicts, extract data, generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams, and create forest and funnel plots in one project. Core review workflows are free; AI-assisted screening and extraction are available when teams need to move faster.
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I’m Robin, founder of EvidenceFlow.
I built EvidenceFlow after seeing how difficult it is for researchers to manage a systematic review across disconnected tools: one for references, another for screening, spreadsheets for extraction, separate software for meta-analysis, and manual PRISMA reporting at the end.
EvidenceFlow brings the workflow into one place:
• Define PICO questions and eligibility criteria
• Screen titles, abstracts, and full texts with blinded reviewers
• Detect disagreements and resolve them with an audit trail
• Extract structured study data
• Generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams from real project counts
• Run fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis with forest and funnel plots
• Export project data and outputs for reporting
The core review workflow is free to use. AI-assisted screening and extraction are optional for teams that want help prioritizing and structuring work, while researchers retain control over final decisions.
I would especially value feedback from researchers, students, librarians, epidemiologists, clinicians, and anyone who has completed a literature or systematic review:
1. Which part of the review workflow costs you the most time today?
2. What would make you trust or hesitate to trust a new evidence-synthesis platform?
3. Which free resource would be most useful: a PRISMA generator, PICO builder, extraction template, or meta-analysis calculator?
Thank you for checking out EvidenceFlow. I’ll be here all day to answer questions and learn from your feedback.
About EvidenceFlow on Product Hunt
“Systematic reviews from screening to meta-analysis”
EvidenceFlow was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 2 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #125 on the daily leaderboard. EvidenceFlow is a free-to-use evidence synthesis workspace for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Build PICO questions, run blinded multi-reviewer screening, resolve conflicts, extract data, generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams, and create forest and funnel plots in one project. Core review workflows are free; AI-assisted screening and extraction are available when teams need to move faster.
On the analytics side, EvidenceFlow competes within Productivity, Analytics and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1.3M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how EvidenceFlow performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted EvidenceFlow?
EvidenceFlow was hunted by Robin Tomar. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
Robin Tomar