This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
Ceadly
Human approval for AI agents, sealed as proof
Every enterprise using AI agents faces the same gap: agents now send emails, issue refunds, and touch production systems, but there's no record of who approved it before it happened. Ceadly adds one line of code, @guard, in front of any consequential agent action. Execution pauses. A named, accountable reviewer decides — Approve, Reject, Modify, or Request More Info. The decision is hashed and timestamped the instant it's made. Not a log. A signature.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
Three weeks ago, Ziya and I left our jobs to build this full-time.
The problem: AI agents don't just answer questions anymore — they send emails, issue refunds, write to production databases. When one misfires, the incident log shows an agent name and a timestamp. No approver. No proof anyone was watching before it happened.
Ceadly fixes that with one line of code. A decorator (@guard) pauses any consequential agent action before it executes. A named reviewer sees exactly what's about to happen and picks: Approve, Reject, Modify, or Request More Info. The moment they decide, it's hashed and timestamped — tamper-evident proof of who approved what, and when.
We're not another observability dashboard telling you what already happened. We're the checkpoint that stops it before it does.
Still early — three weeks into building the product itself, MVP live, no signed customers yet. We'd love your honest feedback, especially if you're running (or worried about running) AI agents in production. What would make you trust a system like this enough to put it in front of your own agents? FOR QUESTIONS - [email protected]
About Ceadly on Product Hunt
“Human approval for AI agents, sealed as proof”
Ceadly was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #101 on the daily leaderboard. Every enterprise using AI agents faces the same gap: agents now send emails, issue refunds, and touch production systems, but there's no record of who approved it before it happened. Ceadly adds one line of code, @guard, in front of any consequential agent action. Execution pauses. A named, accountable reviewer decides — Approve, Reject, Modify, or Request More Info. The decision is hashed and timestamped the instant it's made. Not a log. A signature.
On the analytics side, Ceadly competes within SaaS, Developer Tools and Artificial Intelligence — topics that collectively have 1M followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how Ceadly performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted Ceadly?
Ceadly was hunted by Kanan Eldarov. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of Ceadly including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
Kanan Eldarov