This product was not featured by Product Hunt yet. It will not be visible on their landing page and won't be ranked (cannot win product of the day regardless of upvotes).
Product upvotes vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product comments vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvote speed vs the next 3
Waiting for data. Loading
Product upvotes and comments
Waiting for data. Loading
Product vs the next 3
Loading
ATS Score
See in 10 seconds whether a robot can read your resume
Upload your resume and get an ATS score in 10 seconds, plus missing keywords and your three worst problems. Free, no signup, no email. The free scan runs entirely in your browser: the file never leaves your device. The full 21-check report is $9.99 once, or $19.99 with a rewrite targeted at your job. No subscription, nothing renews. We do not print the “75% of resumes are rejected by ATS” statistic. It traces to a 2012 sales pitch that never published a method.
Every resume tool I looked at opens with the same number: "75% of resumes are rejected by ATS". I went looking for the source. It traces back to a 2012 sales presentation by a resume optimisation company that shut down the following year and never published a methodology. RezScore tested about 5,000 resumes in 2026 and found 93% parsed cleanly.
So I built this the opposite way. It only reports problems that are provably there, and it won't print a scary number to make the results feel urgent.
Two other choices worth explaining:
1. Scoring is 21 deterministic rules, not an LLM. The same resume returns exactly the same score every time. A model only touches the paid rewrite step — and it never invents experience for you. Anything you have to supply yourself comes back in square brackets.
2. Pricing is one-time, not monthly. A job search usually lasts a few weeks, and paying a subscription for three weeks of use is the complaint people repeat most about the existing tools.
What it does not do: no resume builder, no job tracker, no browser extension, no LinkedIn integration. If you need those, the existing tools have them and I don't.
Free tier is unlimited and needs no account.
One question I'd genuinely like answered: which of the 21 checks do you think is wrong? The one we argue about internally is "every bullet must start with a verb" — that's a readability heuristic, not something any AI actually checks.
About ATS Score on Product Hunt
“See in 10 seconds whether a robot can read your resume”
ATS Score was submitted on Product Hunt and earned 0 upvotes and 1 comments, placing #196 on the daily leaderboard. Upload your resume and get an ATS score in 10 seconds, plus missing keywords and your three worst problems. Free, no signup, no email. The free scan runs entirely in your browser: the file never leaves your device. The full 21-check report is $9.99 once, or $19.99 with a rewrite targeted at your job. No subscription, nothing renews. We do not print the “75% of resumes are rejected by ATS” statistic. It traces to a 2012 sales pitch that never published a method.
On the analytics side, ATS Score competes within Productivity, Human Resources and Career — topics that collectively have 669.7k followers on Product Hunt. The dashboard above tracks how ATS Score performed against the three products that launched closest to it on the same day.
Who hunted ATS Score?
ATS Score was hunted by ATS Score. A “hunter” on Product Hunt is the community member who submits a product to the platform — uploading the images, the link, and tagging the makers behind it. Hunters typically write the first comment explaining why a product is worth attention, and their followers are notified the moment they post. Around 79% of featured launches on Product Hunt are self-hunted by their makers, but a well-known hunter still acts as a signal of quality to the rest of the community. See the full all-time top hunters leaderboard to discover who is shaping the Product Hunt ecosystem.
For a complete overview of ATS Score including community comment highlights and product details, visit the product overview.
ATS Score
Every resume tool I looked at opens with the same number: "75% of resumes are rejected by ATS". I went looking for the source. It traces back to a 2012 sales presentation by a resume optimisation company that shut down the following year and never published a methodology. RezScore tested about 5,000 resumes in 2026 and found 93% parsed cleanly.
So I built this the opposite way. It only reports problems that are provably there, and it won't print a scary number to make the results feel urgent.
Two other choices worth explaining:
1. Scoring is 21 deterministic rules, not an LLM. The same resume returns exactly the same score every time. A model only touches the paid rewrite step — and it never invents experience for you. Anything you have to supply yourself comes back in square brackets.
2. Pricing is one-time, not monthly. A job search usually lasts a few weeks, and paying a subscription for three weeks of use is the complaint people repeat most about the existing tools.
What it does not do: no resume builder, no job tracker, no browser extension, no LinkedIn integration. If you need those, the existing tools have them and I don't.
Free tier is unlimited and needs no account.
One question I'd genuinely like answered: which of the 21 checks do you think is wrong? The one we argue about internally is "every bullet must start with a verb" — that's a readability heuristic, not something any AI actually checks.